The Other Worlds Shrine

Your place for discussion about RPGs, gaming, music, movies, anime, computers, sports, and any other stuff we care to talk about... 

  • sports manga was right all along!

  • Somehow, we still tolerate each other. Eventually this will be the only forum left.
Somehow, we still tolerate each other. Eventually this will be the only forum left.
 #135426  by Don
 Wed Apr 22, 2009 4:24 pm
I was reading some article from ESPN, it was talking about the Celtics-Bulls game. Paul Pierce had the ball and they were behind by 1, and there's like 20 seconds or so left. He went for a 2 point jump shot, and some guy fouled him hard. Pierce made 1 of 2 free throws to tie the game, and the Celtics would go on to lose in the game in overtime.

Now common sense says fouling Paul Pierce was a bad idea. If you look at his shooting percentage, the chance of him making 2 free throws is much higher than him making a contested jumper. But the article went on about how the foul was a good foul because the hard foul intimidated the Celtics, and maybe sometime during the overtime Ray Allen missed a shot because he saw what happened to Paul Pierce and figure he better shoot quick or get hammered hard. Clearly the Celtics were intimidated by the hard foul which is why they lost in OT.

And then I realized this is what Shoot! preaches, even though it's soccer. The classic move for the good guys' team is to try to score the ball with a kick from midfield. I don't think it has ever worked, even in a fictional world, but every time it gets blocked and causing them to lose possession, they say now the opponent is going to be scared of them kicking the ball from midfield so they'll now react slower. And it obviously works for the good guys, since they never lose a game.

I guess life indeed does imitiate art.

 #135428  by Chris
 Wed Apr 22, 2009 4:50 pm
um......yeahbuhwha?
 #135429  by Kupek
 Wed Apr 22, 2009 5:04 pm
Don wrote:Clearly the Celtics were intimidated by the hard foul which is why they lost in OT.
"Clearly?" I think it's hard to demonstrate that. Since the margins of winning in professional basketball are so slim, it means randomness plays a large role in the outcome of a game.
 #135432  by Don
 Wed Apr 22, 2009 5:51 pm
Kupek wrote:
Don wrote:Clearly the Celtics were intimidated by the hard foul which is why they lost in OT.
"Clearly?" I think it's hard to demonstrate that. Since the margins of winning in professional basketball are so slim, it means randomness plays a large role in the outcome of a game.
That's not my opinion. That's what the article said.

Obviously the most likely outcome was Paul Pierce should've made both free throws and Celtics win in regulation, and we'd say the guy who fouled was dumb because it's easier to make 2 free throws than a contested jumper. But obviously who wrote this was attempting to justify the decision by the fact that the Bulls eventually won in overtime, just like how sports manga always attempt to justify their nonsensical strategy since the writer obviously already knows the outcome of the game, just as the writer of this article also already knows the outcome of the game as well.