Curious to find an actual study that rated newspapers (and maybe other media sources) by their bias. I was having a conversation with a rather right-winged co-worker, and he claimed that there was no such thing as a right-winged newspaper. "Well, what about Washington Times?", I said. "Oh, that's a liberal paper." "If Washington Times is liberal, then what in the hell is the Post?"
Seems like arguments like these can be easily quelled with scientific research in the area. There's too many people that have this misconception in the "liberal media" just because their POV make them feel that way.
Seems like arguments like these can be easily quelled with scientific research in the area. There's too many people that have this misconception in the "liberal media" just because their POV make them feel that way.
Rosalina: But you didn't.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.