Page 1 of 1

Is there an underground news source that isn't udder crap?  HAARP is very real, but we don't need articles like this.

PostPosted:Sun Jun 08, 2003 6:03 pm
by SineSwiper
<div style='font: 10pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light"; text-align: left; '><b>Link:</b> <a href="http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?art ... webcast</a>

Is there an underground news source that isn't udder crap? HAARP is very real, but we don't need articles like this.</div>

PostPosted:Sun Jun 08, 2003 8:39 pm
by ManaMan
<div style='font: 12pt Arial; text-align: left; '>Jeez, what a nutball...</div>

PostPosted:Sun Jun 08, 2003 9:47 pm
by Tessian
<div style='font: 11pt Dominion; text-align: left; '>heh that's cute; behavior and weather modification in one? Right...</div>

PostPosted:Sun Jun 08, 2003 10:17 pm
by SineSwiper
<div style='font: 10pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light"; text-align: left; '><b>Link:</b> <a href="http://www.earthpulse.com/haarp/">More info. Imagine Tesla's experiments on a planet-wide scale.</a>

What's worse is that articles like these are diluting an incredibly dangerous threat. HAARP is the one thing I could actually call a doomsday device.</div>

PostPosted:Sun Jun 08, 2003 10:33 pm
by Judgment 1999
<div style='font: 14pt ; text-align: left; '>Damn, what a......fruitcake.</div>

PostPosted:Mon Jun 09, 2003 1:29 pm
by the Gray
<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>Jebus there's an asstonne of reading to do on that site. Talking here with my Physicist Cousin, he explains that most of what is said is theoretically correct. Scary shit.</div>

PostPosted:Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:02 pm
by SineSwiper
<div style='font: 10pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light"; text-align: left; '>Yeah, the more I read it, the more I realize that this is the thing that going to kill us all.</div>

PostPosted:Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:23 pm
by the Gray
<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>We humans are so ingenious at creating ways to kill ourselves aren't we?</div>

What really puzzles me is...

PostPosted:Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:44 pm
by SineSwiper
<div style='font: 10pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light"; text-align: left; '>The fact that the military is trying to make bigger badder weapons, when we won't use them. We already have nukes and other WoMD that are banned from use in war, so a project like this seems counter-productive. They should work on making war "safer": stun guns, so-called "non-lethal" weapons, more accurate EMP bombs that can disable tanks and radar.

We go in with an attitude, especially in the US-Iraq War, that we need to be careful with targets and civilians and the like. Why not stun all of your enemies and disable their hardware? You can take the POWs like we did with some of the Iraqi soldiers and still not risk killing civilians. You can bomb the tanks and radar and anything else of military importance with EMP pulses.</div>

There are many 'reasons' (which I don't believe) for having Bigger badder weapons.

PostPosted:Mon Jun 09, 2003 4:41 pm
by the Gray
<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>Number one is that ever popular word 'Deterant'. You know, like the US stockpile of 'Nuclear Deterrants'?

Number 2 is Pyschological. HAARP is one badass pysch weapon, it can hit you anywhere anytime really. Even worse, it could be used far more subtly to alter the ecology of a country by changing the ionosphere above it. The threat of ecological/economical disaster is a great way to force your opponents to step in line.

Those are the obvious Military applications. There are far more benefitial uses that even I as a scientific idiot can think of that would never be used. I'm too cynical to believe that it would be used to benefit others, when it could be used for power instead.</div>