more sports journalism
PostPosted:Tue May 12, 2009 8:49 pm
I came across this article on ESPN about Celtics vs Magic
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs/ ... tup-090512
Now it's 5 key points to watch for in game 5... but from what I can tell, you can put these 5 points as:
1. Point guard match up
2. Shooting guard match up
3. Center match up
4. Intangibles
5. Power forward match up
Now, the article isn't even necessarily bad, but I think it's kind of funny that it's essentially saying 'well whoever wins 4 out of the 5 possible positions to match up plus intangible will definitely win this game." Well yeah, you'd hope so.
I wonder how much do people get pay to write this stuff? Maybe it's not very much...
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs/ ... tup-090512
Now it's 5 key points to watch for in game 5... but from what I can tell, you can put these 5 points as:
1. Point guard match up
2. Shooting guard match up
3. Center match up
4. Intangibles
5. Power forward match up
Now, the article isn't even necessarily bad, but I think it's kind of funny that it's essentially saying 'well whoever wins 4 out of the 5 possible positions to match up plus intangible will definitely win this game." Well yeah, you'd hope so.
I wonder how much do people get pay to write this stuff? Maybe it's not very much...