The Other Worlds Shrine

Your place for discussion about RPGs, gaming, music, movies, anime, computers, sports, and any other stuff we care to talk about... 

  • Taking the anonymity out of online posting

  • Somehow, we still tolerate each other. Eventually this will be the only forum left.
Somehow, we still tolerate each other. Eventually this will be the only forum left.
 #150319  by Anarky
 Fri Dec 03, 2010 7:57 pm
So some may know, but I work as a web designer/developer for a Newspaper company. This week we've deployed a new change to our commenting structure. We've moved away from a vendor called Topix to Facebook commenting.

http://developers.facebook.com/docs/ref ... s/comments

In doing so we've taken away anonymous posting. You must have a facebook account in order to post on articles. You can still make a fake account and all if you really want to.

The comments and emails we've gotten regarding the change have been largely negative of course, but prior to this change our discussions were just full of trolls. It's really a mixed blessing.

Since we're using facebooks API we're very limited in the information we have using said widgets. We don't get stats, reporting, or a real administration panel. In order to use the admin panel you have to generate the code, post it, and add people who are your friends on facebook to be admins. Oo

http://www.dailynews.com/news/ci_16701377
 #150321  by Anarky
 Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:08 pm
Shrinweck wrote:I love how the second comment is about how she won't be posting because she doesn't want her photo and facebook profile attached to it...
Exactly, some real geniuses.
 #150337  by Julius Seeker
 Sat Dec 04, 2010 7:26 am
It makes sense. A lot of the time discussions under Newspaper articles lack the maturity of a gaming discussion board. There's racism, extremist views, slander, and much more. For newspaper articles, people should be accountable within our community for what they post in this sort of arena.
 #150353  by SineSwiper
 Sun Dec 05, 2010 11:50 am
Depends on your definition of "anonymous". Obviously, Bradass87 isn't very anonymous.
 #150486  by Shrinweck
 Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:06 pm
Andrew, Killer Bee wrote:There is some irony in a newspaper allowing no comments from anonymous sources.
Maybe but it shouldn't be a license for unhindered douchebaggery. And it's not like these people are writing well thought out articles.