SineSwiper wrote:This is coming from somebody who didn't read the whole article.
But, regardless, I don't understand what's the point of these tourneys. Computers have won. Game over, man. This sort of cheating is going to get more popular and communication devices are going to get smaller and smaller. Eventually, they'll get something that you can't detect at all, embedded in the earlobe or some like that. Then what?
Well just because computer can almost certainly beat us in any video game that has a significant action element too doesn't stop us from having human competition in these games too.
But in this article one guy is taking some kind of PDA and was looking at it during the middle of the match, and it took several matches before it even occurred to his opponent that he was just entering the current board position on his PDA. How stupid is that? There are other scenarios of cheating since a lot of these tournaments are boardcasted live, so you can obviously have a friend quickly put in the board position and find a way to relay that info back. In the French cheating example what they did was have the captain walk between certain seats after he receives a text message from another team member that's in front of a computer, and whoever is playing can just look at where the captain is to figure out what's his next move. That got discovered because the teammate sent the text to the wrong guy. Another one indeed had something like you said, the guy had some kind of tiny receiver thing by his ear and was fed moves. Now I'm not surprised that people cheat in these tournaments, but I thought it was funny how the first guy was blatantly cheating and no one even suspected it. It's like that guy wasn't even trying to be subtle.