The Shrine

PostPosted:**Mon Feb 23, 2004 5:28 am**

<div style='font: 10pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light", "Century Gothic"; text-align: left; '><b>Link:</b> <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/climatechange ... .html">Now the Pentagon tells Bush: climate change will destroy us</a>

That's a helluva "leak"...</div>

PostPosted:**Mon Feb 23, 2004 5:37 am**

<div style='font: 11pt ; text-align: left; '>Heh, I wonder what life will be like for my grandchildren 100 years from now....</div>

PostPosted:**Mon Feb 23, 2004 7:36 am**

<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>I think it's a safe assumption that it will probably suck =)</div>

PostPosted:**Mon Feb 23, 2004 1:42 pm**

<div style='font: 12pt Arial; text-align: left; '>Sounds about as legitimate as Bush's claims about Iraq's WMD.</div>

PostPosted:**Mon Feb 23, 2004 6:09 pm**

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Helluva leak indeed. I wonder if it's legit? I got a copy of the Fresno Bee today and searched for that, and no dice. I find it odd that a British paper would be the only ones to get that story. Although if it's found in a US paper, I'll eat my words.</div>

PostPosted:**Tue Feb 24, 2004 1:22 am**

<div style='font: 10pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light", "Century Gothic"; text-align: left; '>More about that <a href="http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/wot/ ... l">here</a>.

Besides, if the CONSERVATIVE Pentagon is telling the public that Bush is full of shit about global warming, why not fucking listen? This was sitting in a office for months until it got leaked, because the Bush administration didn't want it to get out. This is some FUCKING SERIOUS shit! There are more stories here:

this <a href="http://observer.guardian.co.uk/internat ... ml">bullet point summary of the report findings</a>,
the <a href="http://www.fortune.com/fortune/print/0, ... l">Fortune Magazine article</a>,
this <a href="http://progressivetrail.org/articles/04 ... >political analysis on the Progressive Trail website</a>,
an article entitled "<a href="http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=17711">The Ice Age Cometh</a>",
and this <a href="http://mitosyfraudes.8k.com/Calen/Lands ... html">very good scientific article with good charts and graphs</a>.</div>

PostPosted:**Tue Feb 24, 2004 1:27 am**

<div style='font: 10pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light", "Century Gothic"; text-align: left; '><b>Link:</b> <a href="http://news.google.com/news?q=Climate+change">Use Google News, duh!</a>

You can't search...</div>

PostPosted:**Tue Feb 24, 2004 1:28 am**

PostPosted:**Tue Feb 24, 2004 4:14 pm**

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Of course I could, but when I've got people ready to do it for me, why? But what I'm looking for is a US article on the matter that doesn't cite the Guardian. Or the report itself. No luck with your google link thus far.</div>

PostPosted:**Wed Feb 25, 2004 1:42 am**

<div style='font: 10pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light", "Century Gothic"; text-align: left; '>Ahhh...found it:

<a href="http://www.ems.org/climate/pentagon_cli ... .pdf">Full report</a>
<a href="http://www.ems.org/climate/exec_pentago ... >Executive summary</a></div>

PostPosted:**Wed Feb 25, 2004 8:15 am**

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>I just thought it was odd that the London Observer would get the leak, as opposed to a US paper. But the full report links do satisfy me. So I ask you: Do words taste well cooked? Because I've had them raw, and I didn't enjoy it. :)</div>

The Shrine

That's a helluva "leak"...

That's a helluva "leak"...

Bush's claims about Iraq's WMD came from the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans (created by Rumsfeld after 9/11), which didn't get reviewed by the FBI/CIA...

Since it was leaked to the London Observer itself, of course they would be the ones cited all of the time. As far as the report itself, I believe Fark had a link...