Personal Info Debate...and freemasons!
PostPosted:Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:50 pm
[Edited]
Your place for discussion about RPGs, gaming, music, movies, anime, computers, sports, and any other stuff we care to talk about...
https://tows.cc/phpBB2/
No need to explain - it wasnt appropriate.Shrinweck wrote:Edit: Thanks for removing.
Edit 2: Sorry I just wasn't comfortable with the thought of not posting here for 5 years and then having someone posting my name and professional information completely in the open. Even if it's publicly available, it doesn't mean it needs to be announced. Just didn't like the idea of a friends information posted like that.
When did that happen? Please show me where I was ever given an option to have anything here removed.kali o. wrote: - You were given the option to have it removed, but chose not to, apparently preferring to leave it for something to complain about.
Your reply (26 Jan 2007 04:21 am)kali o. wrote: Your personal info isn't linked, it's a pay-to-use site (which is silly because it's publically available for free at any Federal Records building). If it really bothers you that much, I'll clip the link out of Sine's post, if you ask me too.
lol.Nev wrote:fuck your arrogant face
*eyeroll* How the hell am I supposed to review private messages sent eight years ago in an account I no longer have access to?kali o. wrote:Also, to be clear, you posted both your name and your proximity to Sherman Oaks (Tekken) plenty of times before, so nothing was new info. (Andrew Seidman/27/Sherman Oaks)
In any case, don't play fast and loose with history, the internet never forgets
There's a little caveat there you might want to be aware of - your "thinking it" doesn't make it valid or defensible in a legal sense. Seeing as how I haven't "blown anything up" in the five years since it was posted, and never will, I think you lose on that one, Kal. And you're not used to losing at anything, are you? But let's go with the idea that free speech is still at the core of North American ideology for a moment.kali o. wrote:As for the libel, just be aware (in my case at least), it is nothing of the sort. I believe you are very sick and could be a potential danger, to yourself or others. I do actually want you to get help...and I think it is pretty lame how little support western society provides for mental illness. I almost wish I stuck with my education so I could be proactive in that area.
You make your living evicting people, which you are proud of. I know a good many people who would consider you to be sicker and worse for society than I promise that I could ever be.kali o. wrote:I just took a screenshot of all of that...I WILL SUE YOU FOR LIBEL!!
....
Lol. Am I doing that right? Mental illness is no excuse for missing the hypocrisy but if you were just hoping to get a reaction outta me, realize what it means when I don't care
If you'd left it alone I would have as well. All I did was post two public pages Kupek himself had seen to make public - meaning nothing untoward or inappropriate at all, just the chance to put people in touch with someone they might have considered a friend. I promise I won't make that mistake again!kali o. wrote:IIt was *you* who once again made a random thread all about *you* (something you do a lot). I was simply clarifying your personal distortion of victimization (something you also do alot).
And now it isn't? Now I'm not even worthy of the same respect level you gave me eight years ago, despite my own many attempts to reconcile with the community here? You'll just leave up the most hateful shit alive said about me for an eternity because you're now "fully aware of my illness"?kali o. wrote:For clarity, I would not delete a thread/post on your request. Nor will I go back to purge things you no longer like. The offer way back then was a one time deal, since you were making an issue of it at the time and threatened to leave. Obviously, we were all not fully aware of your illness, so it was reasonable to reach out and compromise.
Really - what would that entail to you?kali o. wrote:I have no beef with you, for the record. I think you are awesome and hope you are healthy again one day. Seriously.
No one suspected you had any malice. One person thought it wasn't appropriate, I agreed and that was that (until you, as usual, came back to make it more than it was and all about *you*).Replay wrote:All I did was post two public pages Kupek himself had seen to make public - meaning nothing untoward or inappropriate at all, just the chance to put people in touch with someone they might have considered a friend. I promise I won't make that mistake again!
Understand and *believe* anything you think you know about me is wrong, caused by me intentionally manipulating you recently (only recently) via obvious faults in your thinking process. Originally, this manipulation was intended to be "revealed" to you after to highlight your issues. But I quickly saw it wouldn't matter once you believed whatever I led you to believe...I was just digging you deeper and that isn't funny, it's just mean.Replay wrote:But okay, I'm openminded - tell me what I have to do to be "sane" to you again.
Replay wrote:I should be nice and pleasant at all times - never make a peep or cry at injustices I see taking place here and elsewhere, or the people being hurt in the process of any of it?
I'd imagine a great deal of what everyone knows here about you is wrong, Kali. It isn't in your nature to allow people here or anywhere to actually know who you are. As you, yourself, said...kali o. wrote:Understand and *believe* anything you think you know about me is wrong, caused by me intentionally manipulating you recently (only recently) via obvious faults in your thinking process. Sat Aug 15, 2015 2:07 am
kali o. wrote:You must know no one of consequence if you are unaware total deniability is the modus operandi at all times and at all levels. Tsk tsk Fri Jul 31, 2015 11:10 am
kali o. wrote:I do engage you...there is a difference. I wish our interactions were more amusing to read...it kind of feels a little played out at this point.
Just bustin your ballskali o. wrote:Damn it, I know, I know.