The Shrine

PostPosted:**Tue Mar 18, 2003 11:59 am**

<div style='font: 12pt Arial; text-align: left; '><b>Link:</b> <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/14/sprj.i ... ents/">Who the hell didn't know he was full of shit?</a>

A large part of Bush's "evidence" of Saddam seeking nuclear weapons turn out to be forged documents...</div>

PostPosted:**Tue Mar 18, 2003 12:23 pm**

PostPosted:**Tue Mar 18, 2003 12:36 pm**

<div style='font: bold 12pt Arial; text-align: left; '>Old news actually, and Bush is stupid strying to pull all this proof out of nowhere...Saddam is in violation of his surrender and is refusing to comply unconditionally, the UN has said so, that's enough for me...</div>

PostPosted:**Tue Mar 18, 2003 2:19 pm**

<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>No, there has been no justification for war, and 98% of the world knows it. The other two percent are a bunch of moronic politicians and inbred rednecks.</div>

PostPosted:**Tue Mar 18, 2003 2:44 pm**

<div style='font: 11pt Dominion; text-align: left; '>nice to see you're not horribly exagerating or anything...</div>

PostPosted:**Tue Mar 18, 2003 3:09 pm**

<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>Prove me wrong.</div>

PostPosted:**Tue Mar 18, 2003 4:38 pm**

<div style='font: 12pt Arial; text-align: left; '>Well I'd call it lying to the american people. Whether or not you support the war you have to acknowledge this impeachable offense.</div>

PostPosted:**Tue Mar 18, 2003 4:42 pm**

<div style='font: 11pt Dominion; text-align: left; '>I'd like to see you prove yourself right. In this country alone about 70% of the population supports the war and that's a well known statistic now-- where's this 98% coming from? You assume the rest of the entire world is against this? Right...most of them don't give a damn</div>

PostPosted:**Tue Mar 18, 2003 5:51 pm**

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>So, it's perfectly OK for your government to lie to you blatantly?</div>

PostPosted:**Tue Mar 18, 2003 7:03 pm**

<div style='font: bold 12pt Arial; text-align: left; '>...and I also believe Britain provided the initial report to our intelligence community which would explain why we didn't check it over very carefully...it was stupid and unnecessarry to try and make Iraq look bad when the UN already provided the smoking gun with 1441 and Saddam's material breach...I stopped being an idealist long ago, I know that my country and every other country does these things and I understand why...if the world had stood with us instead of playing their own gamesand ignoring the resolutions they themselves passed, this could have ended peacefully...</div>

PostPosted:**Tue Mar 18, 2003 7:15 pm**

<div style='font: 11pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light"; text-align: left; '>Violation of what surrender? Who said that he had to surrender?</div>

PostPosted:**Tue Mar 18, 2003 7:38 pm**

<div style='font: 11pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light"; text-align: left; '>If Res 1441 is so damning, why isn't Bush/CNN/Powell/Blair spouting it out as its reasons every time, instead of trying to pull fake evidence out of its ass.</div>

PostPosted:**Tue Mar 18, 2003 7:40 pm**

<div style='font: 11pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light"; text-align: left; '>If Res 1441 is so damning, why isn't Bush/CNN/Powell/Blair spouting it out as its reasons every time, instead of trying to pull fake evidence out of its ass, or say "well, Saddam's a bad guy"?</div>

PostPosted:**Tue Mar 18, 2003 8:12 pm**

<div style='font: bold 12pt Arial; text-align: left; '>Probably because he was trying to convince the UN who had obviously already back-pedalled off 1441...I'm no Bush apologist and I'll be the first to say he's handled this poorly, but so has the UN who could have ended this peacefully...1441should've been enough if they followed through..</div>

PostPosted:**Tue Mar 18, 2003 8:13 pm**

<div style='font: bold 12pt Arial; text-align: left; '>I'm too jaded for that...</div>

PostPosted:**Tue Mar 18, 2003 9:00 pm**

<div style='font: 11pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light"; text-align: left; '>UN Res. 242 should have been enough, but we all know what happened with that one.</div>

PostPosted:**Wed Mar 19, 2003 12:05 am**

<div style='font: bold 12pt Arial; text-align: left; '>He surrendered at the end of the Persian Gulf War...a condition of which was disarmament and full cooperation with inspectors...</div>

PostPosted:**Wed Mar 19, 2003 9:25 am**

<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>The % of the population who doesn't give a crap doesn't support the war now do they?</div>

PostPosted:**Wed Mar 19, 2003 9:46 am**

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Did you realize that you said "Britian provided the proof"? It's kinda ironic that the only ally the US has in this war is the UK, no?</div>

PostPosted:**Wed Mar 19, 2003 11:31 am**

<div style='font: 12pt Arial; text-align: left; '>Let's not forget Spain and Australia! *snicker*</div>

PostPosted:**Wed Mar 19, 2003 3:34 pm**

<div style='font: 11pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light"; text-align: left; '>And he disarmed. Hell, he's disarming weapons which are NOT covered in the surrender. Where are the WoMD?</div>

The Shrine

A large part of Bush's "evidence" of Saddam seeking nuclear weapons turn out to be forged documents...

A large part of Bush's "evidence" of Saddam seeking nuclear weapons turn out to be forged documents...

Never said it was and I'm not happy about it, but it's nothing new and we're not the only country that does things like this...