Casino Royale, not just good, but surprisingly good
PostPosted:Thu Nov 23, 2006 7:28 am
I got a chance to see it last night with one of my roommates (Lindsey, some of you know her through Metroid Prime Hunters); her opinion was quite similar to mine (with the addition that she thinks Daniel Craig is "smokin'") in that she loved the movie.
Craig is certainly not the refined pretty-boy wimp that Brosnan was in the previous 4 movies. He is a much better Bond and seemed to embrace the role much better than Brosnan.
The writing credits go to the critically acclaimed Paul Haggis (Crash and Million Dollar Baby), and it really showed through. The story really breathed back into the Bond series, the spirit of the older movies not seen since the 1980's. This was no Generic action flick based on the Bond license (as I would judge Brosnan's movies), but a true Bond movie.
I am really looking forward to Craig's next film. I am also glad that this movie shut all those naysayers up (including the ones here at the Shrine =P). So much for their adamant prediction of Craig being a collosal failure and having a one time deal.
Craig is certainly not the refined pretty-boy wimp that Brosnan was in the previous 4 movies. He is a much better Bond and seemed to embrace the role much better than Brosnan.
The writing credits go to the critically acclaimed Paul Haggis (Crash and Million Dollar Baby), and it really showed through. The story really breathed back into the Bond series, the spirit of the older movies not seen since the 1980's. This was no Generic action flick based on the Bond license (as I would judge Brosnan's movies), but a true Bond movie.
I am really looking forward to Craig's next film. I am also glad that this movie shut all those naysayers up (including the ones here at the Shrine =P). So much for their adamant prediction of Craig being a collosal failure and having a one time deal.