Page 1 of 1

Real life copycat Kira?

PostPosted:Tue Jan 01, 2008 12:31 pm
by Tessian
This is kinda old news (September) but when I was on the wiki looking up Death Note for Sine I saw this.

"On September 28, 2007, two notes stating "Watashi wa Kira dess" (I am Kira, with "desu" being the more literal and correct transliteration of the verb) were found near the unidentified remains of a Caucasian male. Nothing was found on or near the victim besides these two notes. Belgian police are investigating the matter further."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manga_Murder

PostPosted:Tue Jan 01, 2008 1:58 pm
by Don
They sell Death Note notebooks in Japan. This shouldn't be surprising.

PostPosted:Tue Jan 01, 2008 6:30 pm
by Tessian
Don Wang wrote:They sell Death Note notebooks in Japan. This shouldn't be surprising.
This was in Belgium man... kinda far from Japan.

PostPosted:Tue Jan 01, 2008 6:43 pm
by Don
Anime spreads far these days.

Death Note was banned on TV in China, probably to prevent things like that from happening.

PostPosted:Tue Jan 01, 2008 6:53 pm
by Tessian
I'm aware, but I still find someone who tries to copycat an anime, especially outside of Japan, is a pretty huge deal.

PostPosted:Tue Jan 01, 2008 11:03 pm
by Zeus
Don Wang wrote:They sell Death Note notebooks in Japan. This shouldn't be surprising.
Oh God, I WANT. How much are they?

PostPosted:Tue Jan 01, 2008 11:21 pm
by Eric
Zeus wrote:
Don Wang wrote:They sell Death Note notebooks in Japan. This shouldn't be surprising.
Oh God, I WANT. How much are they?
http://www.399animeshop.com/anime/death ... a-size.php

17.99, and I think this one runs out of pages. :p

PostPosted:Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:56 pm
by Zeus
Eric wrote:
Zeus wrote:
Don Wang wrote:They sell Death Note notebooks in Japan. This shouldn't be surprising.
Oh God, I WANT. How much are they?
http://www.399animeshop.com/anime/death ... a-size.php

17.99, and I think this one runs out of pages. :p
WOW I'm tempted. It would be so much fun to write up stuff in that. I'm gonna start a Death Note thread here where we can all have fun making up Death Note-like deaths for each of us. Should be highly entertaining for about a week :-)

PostPosted:Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:09 pm
by Eric
Zeus Between January 7-30 he watches Transformers the movie daily, then dies of a heart attack. :P

PostPosted:Wed Jan 02, 2008 4:05 pm
by Zeus
Eric wrote:Zeus Between January 7-30 he watches Transformers the movie daily, then dies of a heart attack. :P
You're not supposed to let them die in bliss! It's supposed to be natural, that would be more planned looking.

PostPosted:Wed Jan 02, 2008 4:38 pm
by Don
You have to specify an exact date. I thought you guys watch DN?

PostPosted:Wed Jan 02, 2008 5:46 pm
by Zeus
Don Wang wrote:You have to specify an exact date. I thought you guys watch DN?
He did, Jan 30. It's the time he missed

PostPosted:Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:37 pm
by Don
I thought he wrote bewteen Jan 7 and Jan 30. You can't control people further than 1 day away from when they died so this would fail anyway and you'd just get an immediate heart attack.

PostPosted:Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:09 pm
by Eric
You can control somebody up to 23 days actually.

For example when Light got Mello's original hideout he got the address from one of the mafia members weeks in advance so he could plan out the raid, the mafia member didn't die until many many days after he sent that.

PostPosted:Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:11 pm
by Zeus
The smell of sour milk is far more potent on Eric than Don XD

PostPosted:Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:25 pm
by Don
I thought that happened on the same day, though I didn't keep track of all the retro-rules they added to patch up the holes.

At any rate that scene you're talking about should've been nullified because the action would be used to cause the death of others, possibly M, similar to how you can't make someone launch a nuclear missile as they're dying. Not that DN has exactly the most rigid of world view, of course.

PostPosted:Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:37 pm
by Eric
Zeus wrote:The smell of sour milk is far more potent on Eric than Don XD
Shadap you. :p
Don Wang wrote:At any rate that scene you're talking about should've been nullified because the action would be used to cause the death of others, possibly M, similar to how you can't make someone launch a nuclear missile as they're dying. Not that DN has exactly the most rigid of world view, of course.
*Raises finger* But M didn't die. :)

PostPosted:Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:13 pm
by Don
Well they obviously thought that was going to be enough to kill him.

I remember one of the popular thing people said Kira can do is just write like '(some random guy) blows up near L' and eventually one of them got to accidentally blow himself up too close next to L and get him. I guess the notebook itself magically knows whether any action is ever actually going to lead to anyone else's death.

PostPosted:Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:19 pm
by Eric
Don Wang wrote:Well they obviously thought that was going to be enough to kill him.

I remember one of the popular thing people said Kira can do is just write like '(some random guy) blows up near L' and eventually one of them got to accidentally blow himself up too close next to L and get him. I guess the notebook itself magically knows whether any action is ever actually going to lead to anyone else's death.
Or maybe in the that event the person doesn't die?

Like if somebody has a heart attack while driving and goes off a cliff the other person in the car somehow survives? ;p

PostPosted:Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:53 am
by Don
What's supposed to happen is if your condition would cause someone else (that you don't know the name/face of) to die, it'd get aborted as an immedaite heart attack. But then you could ask what if they just make whoever's driving the car L is in have a heart attack, that'd have a good chance of killing him.

PostPosted:Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:49 pm
by SineSwiper
I think it was designed for a direct cause of killing somebody else. You can't order another person to kill somebody else. It doesn't really apply to six-degrees-of-Kevin-Bacon indirect actions.

Of course, a counterpoint to that is the Rem/L incident, which does seem to be a pretty indirect action. Under that logic, Death Gods would be afraid of killing anybody, since it could potentially increase somebody else's lifespan.

PostPosted:Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:05 pm
by Tessian
I thought the guiding rule in all that was the knowledge that you can't force someone to do something they either couldn't or wouldn't do on their own. Examples being asking a prisoner in Florida to die in 20 minutes at the Liberty Bell, or have a man rape and kill his family.

PostPosted:Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:36 pm
by Don
You can make someone do something they would not do, but you can't make them do something that they could not do.

As for the indirect/direct issue, it's a pretty buggy issue. There's plenty of way to kill L if all you need is avoid a direct kill. It's pretty clear that you can't even indirectly kill someone. There's one part where they say you can't have someone launch a nuclear mission, but it was okay to give the location of the secret hideout. So why not have the president give you the code to launch a nuclear missile before he dies? But then that'd probably be illegal too...