serously.....that fucking blew ass.....it was like Jason Bateman surrounded by poop...it doesn't touch him but it get's al over everything else.....ugh....that fucking blew all kinds of ass
Your place for discussion about RPGs, gaming, music, movies, anime, computers, sports, and any other stuff we care to talk about...
Hancock.......NO!
- Your favorite band sucks, and you have terrible taste in movies.
Haha, did you see the game trailer?
-Insert Inspiring Quote-
I expected a decently tolerable one...instead I got one that didn't know what it wanted to be....the start is retarded comedy, then it does generic superhero for a bit which is then followed up with it trying to be a serious drama. The only decent thing about the movie was that Bateman was fantastic. other thn that it was just bad....will was pretty good he just couldn't save a butchered script.....it was supposed ot be a little over 2 hours if you read the script for it (they cut almost the entirety of the character development which made the flick feel stilted and jumpy.) Instead it clocks in at about an hour twenty of actual screen time....Zeus wrote:Will Smith on July 4th weekend.....did you expect a good movie?Chris wrote:that was better than the movie
Seriously? The trailers look fantastic--seems like comedy, but with honest drama and emotion adn all that jazz. Is it really that terrible?
yep.sort of an hour and a half superman returns....really nly 4 actions sequences and only one of them is really any good. the character shift seems really badly done and honestly...it's missing about a halfhour of development. it just didn't know what kind of movie it wanted to beRentCavalier wrote:Seriously? The trailers look fantastic--seems like comedy, but with honest drama and emotion adn all that jazz. Is it really that terrible?
Will Smith is a good actor. I don't understand all of the hate. Some of the reviews said that he was the only good part about the movie.Zeus wrote:Will Smith on July 4th weekend.....did you expect a good movie?
Also, what the fuck?! Dave White is no longer a reviewer?!?
Rosalina: But you didn't.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.
I never said he was a bad actor, but being a decent/good actor don't mean you got good movie selection.SineSwiper wrote:Will Smith is a good actor. I don't understand all of the hate. Some of the reviews said that he was the only good part about the movie.Zeus wrote:Will Smith on July 4th weekend.....did you expect a good movie?
Also, what the fuck?! Dave White is no longer a reviewer?!?
I was there on that fateful day, were you?
the problem is is that you can see great potential in it. it's got an interesting premise that was telegraphed to the point where I knew everything that was going to happen 5 minutes into the film.....it made baby jesus cryZeus wrote:I never said he was a bad actor, but being a decent/good actor don't mean you got good movie selection.SineSwiper wrote:Will Smith is a good actor. I don't understand all of the hate. Some of the reviews said that he was the only good part about the movie.Zeus wrote:Will Smith on July 4th weekend.....did you expect a good movie?
Also, what the fuck?! Dave White is no longer a reviewer?!?
So... I liked it. It didn't rock my world, but it was a nice escape for a Tuesday night. I can definitely see where the movie changed directions - for a while, it could have just been a DC Elseworld's, "What if Superman was an asshole?" - but it kept me engaged and entertained.
Yeah, ain't Oscar material, but it's enjoyable. I guess I can understand if you don't like the movie, but I don't really get some of the extreme hate I see on the 'Net. It almost sounds like some of these people actively vomited through 90% of the movie.
I watched it...and liked it just fine. Don't get me wrong, I get why people would be let down - just like Office Space, Hancock felt the need to add a "plot" midway through when the original (and more interesting) premise would have been enough to carry the movie.
For what it was though, Hancock was an enjoyable film.
For what it was though, Hancock was an enjoyable film.
Pretty much my feelings toward it.kali o. wrote:I watched it...and liked it just fine. Don't get me wrong, I get why people would be let down - just like Office Space, Hancock felt the need to add a "plot" midway through when the original (and more interesting) premise would have been enough to carry the movie.
For what it was though, Hancock was an enjoyable film.
Started off interesting. Then suddenly there's this ridiculous explanation about who he is and where he's come from, and his soul mate(Seriously it came out of nowhere), it just went down hill from there.
