Southland Tales Revisited
PostPosted:Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:15 am
Southland Tales is Richard Kelly's latest movie (of Donnie Darko fame) about what is essentially a re-telling of the Book of Revelations. There's a lot of weird stuff around this film.
First of all, it's a 6-chapter story, with the first 3 chapters in comic form, and the last 3 in the movie. In a way, this hurt the reviews of the film because a lot of people didn't get it. There's a LOT going on in this film. It's like an Akira-sized set of references, many of which you're not going to get unless you read the first 3 chapters. It cost $15-18 million to make, failed horribly in Cannes (due to length), and when it was chopped to 2:31, Sony hardly put it out on any theaters, so it made less than a million.
But, it's GOOD. It really is. I watched it the first time without the first 3 chapters myself, and I found myself somewhat confused, but I still saw a good movie in all of that fast-paced mess. This review probably sums up that experience better. Plus, Richard purposely hired actors who were typically typecasted in their roles, and either totally changed them or went with their typecasts. I think the idea worked well.
So, last week, I finally read the first 3 chapters, and then dived into the movie again. (I stopped at the last chapter because I needed to go to bed.) There are a LOT of references and plot connections that make better sense, both by watching the movie the first time, and by reading the comics (which only take about 3 hours, anyway). I'm hoping to see a director's cut with all of the chopped scenes from Cannes.
See, a movie like this is not something for the casual movie goer. If you just go out to watch the movie, either you won't like it, or you'll like it but walk away confused. You have to pretty much dive into his obsession to detail with the full experience: multiple viewings and reading the other chapters. A lot of people don't get Akira either, but it has the same problem.
Besides, if you don't see the movie, you get to miss out on things like this:
Timberlake singing "I've Got Soul But I'm Not A Soldier"
Best car commercial ever made
First of all, it's a 6-chapter story, with the first 3 chapters in comic form, and the last 3 in the movie. In a way, this hurt the reviews of the film because a lot of people didn't get it. There's a LOT going on in this film. It's like an Akira-sized set of references, many of which you're not going to get unless you read the first 3 chapters. It cost $15-18 million to make, failed horribly in Cannes (due to length), and when it was chopped to 2:31, Sony hardly put it out on any theaters, so it made less than a million.
But, it's GOOD. It really is. I watched it the first time without the first 3 chapters myself, and I found myself somewhat confused, but I still saw a good movie in all of that fast-paced mess. This review probably sums up that experience better. Plus, Richard purposely hired actors who were typically typecasted in their roles, and either totally changed them or went with their typecasts. I think the idea worked well.
So, last week, I finally read the first 3 chapters, and then dived into the movie again. (I stopped at the last chapter because I needed to go to bed.) There are a LOT of references and plot connections that make better sense, both by watching the movie the first time, and by reading the comics (which only take about 3 hours, anyway). I'm hoping to see a director's cut with all of the chopped scenes from Cannes.
See, a movie like this is not something for the casual movie goer. If you just go out to watch the movie, either you won't like it, or you'll like it but walk away confused. You have to pretty much dive into his obsession to detail with the full experience: multiple viewings and reading the other chapters. A lot of people don't get Akira either, but it has the same problem.
Besides, if you don't see the movie, you get to miss out on things like this:
Timberlake singing "I've Got Soul But I'm Not A Soldier"
Best car commercial ever made