The Shrine

<div style='font: 9pt Arial; text-align: left; '>Daredevil was okay. Spider-man was better overall, but DD had better fight scenes. Oh, and Colin Farrel is the true star of this movie.</div>

<div style='font: 11pt ; text-align: left; '>I disagree, i thought Dare Devil was better, my reasoning, i hated most of the real chessy acting in spiderman. but to each his own</div>

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>You hate cheesy acting yet like a Ben Afflek movie......?</div>

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>I just saw it. It was as bad as I could possibly have imagined it. Even Garner's hotness couldn't save this waste of time. Pure formulaic crap</div>

<div style='font: ; text-align: left; '>The more I see of DareDevil, the less I want to see it. It looks like I should be able to squeeze it out of a bottle onto a cracker.</div>

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Once again, Ben Afflek was a shitty cast for a role. Also, it was predictable...and the villans were rather boring.

And that chick...yeah, yummy eye candy, but please... That stupid 'first-date' fight? Sai sandbag practice? Those were moments I wished for blindness....

Rental, sure...but nothing more. Imo at least.

KO-</div>

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Dear Lord, we actually agree on a movie</div>

<div style='font: 14pt "Sans Serif"; text-align: justify; padding: 0% 15% 0% 15%; '>Saw it. Pretty damn good overall, better than Spiderman (though I didn't think nearly as highly of Spiderman as most, apparently). I was pleasently suprised and it played the comic pretty seriously, which was nice....</div>

<div style='font: 11pt "Fine Hand"; text-align: left; '>I sorta liked Spiderman....but it wasn't even close to the caliber of 1979 "Superman" and later "Superman II".</div>

<div style='font: 11pt "Fine Hand"; text-align: left; '>"Even a blind man will hit a barn once in a while." =8^)</div>

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Wrong, as usual :-) I thought Spiderman captured the atmosphere and point of the comics very, very well. If it turned out like Daredevil (all action, no real story or character development), I woulda hated it. You can tell that Raimi actually read the comics, unlike Synger</div>

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Daredevil wasn't 1/4 of Spiderman...</div>

<div style='font: 11pt "Fine Hand"; text-align: left; '>You got the worst taste in movies. And what's funny is that you don't know it! What lacked in Spiderman was a good villain. The Goblin was a tacky Power Rangers Baddie reject.</div>

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Dafoe pulled off the goblin exactly as he should have been played. That's what I envisioned Osborne to be like when I read the comics. The suit looked like shit and it was idiotic that it and the machine were for military use, but otherwise, that WAS the goblin</div>

<div style='font: 11pt "Fine Hand"; text-align: left; '>He's a good actor, yes. But as Goblin/Spiderman goes, it's just so so. And how could you say I'm wrong about Spiderman not being up to par with Superman? You need to keep quiet about your bad movie taste. Superman tops it. Batman was even better.</div>

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>I never said that. I just said that Spiderman was great</div>

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>I thought that Spiderman was excellent, as were the first Superman and first 2 Batmans. As much as I like the other Supermans, there were more mindless fun than good movies. But those 4 were the best comic book movies of all time for sure</div>

<div style='font: 14pt "Sans Serif"; text-align: justify; padding: 0% 15% 0% 15%; '>Dude, finally someone who understands this. I mean, out of ALL of Spiderman's villians, they pick the fucking Goblin? Give me a break. And the movie just wasn't as good as people make it out to be overall anyway, I think.</div>

<div style='font: 14pt "Sans Serif"; text-align: justify; padding: 0% 15% 0% 15%; '>And pardon me in advance if I offend anyone with my Comic Dork Aura (CDA). A good 45 minute bath will wash it right off...</div>

<div style='font: 14pt "Sans Serif"; text-align: justify; padding: 0% 15% 0% 15%; '>Very agreed...</div>

<div style='font: 14pt "Sans Serif"; text-align: justify; padding: 0% 15% 0% 15%; '>Dafoe played the role extremely well. But it's still the Goblin...</div>

<div style='font: 14pt "Sans Serif"; text-align: justify; padding: 0% 15% 0% 15%; '>Well, I guess you see more old women getting offed by airline peanuts than I do, but Colin Ferrell played Bullseye extremely well and hardly boring. Bah, I think the excess American air pollution is affecting your judgement. :)</div>

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>An Irish dude with a brand on his forehead who has really good aim doesn't really strike me as fantastic...especially when there is no back story or motivation whatsoever in the movie.

Think about Magneto, Joker or even Green Goblin...fleshed out back story in all of those.

If Daredevil wanted to come to the superhero party late, it should've been prepared to make a much better entrance.

Imo.

KO-</div>

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>....who's the classic Spidey villian AND one of the more popular ones AND the classic villian</div>