Well, I think it had something to do with the fact that the directing, acting, and just about everything else about the first Batman movie set the bar so high, that all the other Batman films (which failed to reach it) turned into dissapointments.
Have you see the photos? He looks like a flamboyant middle-aged homosexual.Gentz wrote:I mean, yeah, audiences liked Scream, but Craven was at least smart enough to give his campiness some Gen-X appeal. Exactly which audience was Shumacher trying to reach with the fake plastic bat-nipples? I guess he figured that flamboyant middle-aged homosexuals were the next big niche market.
"Only" because of Kilmer? He looked the part better (especially the Bruce Wayne part), but I thought Keaton was a better actor.SineSwiper wrote:Batman Forever wasn't too terrible, but that's only because of Val Kilmer.
I read on IMDB that Michael Kane though Kilmer was the best cast Bruce Wayne/Batman. As far as looking the part, I actually think George Clooney fits the best. He's got the square jaw. But I only saw 10 minutes of Batman & Robin, and it was the worst movie I've ever seen, so no luck there.Agent 57 wrote:"Only" because of Kilmer? He looked the part better (especially the Bruce Wayne part), but I thought Keaton was a better actor.
Based on looks, yeah Clooney has the square jaw, but there's just something about him that isn't Batman to me. I think it's that he makes Bruce Wayne/Batman seem too content with everything. Batman is dark, he's carrying the weight of all of Gotham's crime on his shoulders. I didn't think Clooney conveyed that well.Kupek wrote:I read on IMDB that Michael Kane though Kilmer was the best cast Bruce Wayne/Batman. As far as looking the part, I actually think George Clooney fits the best. He's got the square jaw. But I only saw 10 minutes of Batman & Robin, and it was the worst movie I've ever seen, so no luck there.
Umm, Robin Williams would have played the part a lot better and not so over the top.Agent 57 wrote:I doubt anybody at the time could have pulled off the Riddler better than Jim Carrey.
Clooney fits Batman, about as much as Bill Murray fits Batman. There's something about looking at that poster of him almost grinning in costume, and thinking "I'm Batman...no, seriously, I'm Batman...why are you laughing? I'm really Batman!"Lox wrote:Based on looks, yeah Clooney has the square jaw, but there's just something about him that isn't Batman to me. I think it's that he makes Bruce Wayne/Batman seem too content with everything. Batman is dark, he's carrying the weight of all of Gotham's crime on his shoulders. I didn't think Clooney conveyed that well.Kupek wrote:I read on IMDB that Michael Kane though Kilmer was the best cast Bruce Wayne/Batman. As far as looking the part, I actually think George Clooney fits the best. He's got the square jaw. But I only saw 10 minutes of Batman & Robin, and it was the worst movie I've ever seen, so no luck there.
They had actually wanted Williams as their actor but he turned them down 'cause the scripts sucked (that's pretty obvious). He was easily the best choice to play Riddler in a Burton-esque film. Jim Carrey was the consolation prizeThe Seeker wrote:As much as I love Robin Williams' stand-up, I'm going to have to dissagree here and say that Jim Carey was the best possible actor for the job.
According to IMDB (can you guess what I do when I can't get something working and I need a distraction?) Williams was also (justifiabley) pissed at them. Supposedly they disingenously talked to him about the Joker just to force Nicholson to commit.Zeus wrote:They had actually wanted Williams as their actor but he turned them down 'cause the scripts sucked (that's pretty obvious). He was easily the best choice to play Riddler in a Burton-esque film. Jim Carrey was the consolation prize