Oldie but goodie
PostPosted:Wed Jul 12, 2006 8:25 pm
by Zeus
Not sure if I posted this here or not, but I was sifting through my old bookmarks and found this at Gamespy:
http://archive.gamespy.com/articles/jun ... stmoments/
It's the 25 dumbest moments in gaming history. Pretty fun read.
PostPosted:Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:32 am
by Julius Seeker
I like this one. I would have titled it: NEVER fuck with the Mob
Universal Goes Ape
Donkey Kong was the early hit that cemented Nintendo's position in the video-game business, and the cash cow that sustained the fledgling Nintendo of America. The game became an outright phenomenon, and Nintendo signed deals for everything from board games to lunch boxes to a cartoon show. More importantly, it sold the rights to make various console and computer ports. With over 60,000 Donkey Kong machines produced, and all of the income from the various licensing deals, Nintendo was flying high.
Poor, innocent Donkey Kong. He just wanted to be loved.
Until, that is, Nintendo's Japanese office received a telex from MCA Universal stating that the company had 48 hours to hand all profits earned from Donkey Kong over to MCA and destroy all unsold Donkey Kong inventory. The reason? MCA alleged that Donkey Kong infringed on Universal Studios' "King Kong" copyright. Never fond of being threatened, NoA met with MCA lawyers, seemingly with the intent of settling. MCA could see no other outcome, but Nintendo was suspicious, and asked for a short delay. It was granted, and the Nintendo legal team went to work digging up everything it could on the "King Kong" property.
A month later, the two sides reconvened. After a civil dinner, Nintendo counsel Howard Lincoln dropped the bomb: They weren't settling. MCA honcho Sid Sheinberg reportedly went ballistic, and the lawsuit was on. Unfortunately for MCA, Nintendo had a very good reason for refraining from a settlement: It had discovered that MCA did not own the "King Kong" copyright! Even more shockingly, in a previous lawsuit MCA Universal had actually gone to pains to prove that the "King Kong" property was public domain!
The writing was on the wall. With such strong evidence on its side, Nintendo pushed for a dismissal, which the judge quickly granted. MCA was ordered to pay $1.8 million in damages to Nintendo and to return the money it had bullied out of other Donkey Kong-affiliated licensees it had drawn into the dispute.
PostPosted:Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:19 pm
by Zeus
yeah, I remember reading about that in Game Over. Lincoln did a lot of very good legal manoevering for Nintendo back in the day. He's probably why the FTC only gave Nintendo a slap on the wrist for it's Nazi-like practices with the NES
PostPosted:Thu Jul 13, 2006 5:10 pm
by Nev
It's funny to read about how Duke Nukem Forever "is going to be released later this year" (said year being, apparently, 2003).
PostPosted:Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:04 pm
by Julius Seeker
Zeus wrote:yeah, I remember reading about that in Game Over. Lincoln did a lot of very good legal manoevering for Nintendo back in the day. He's probably why the FTC only gave Nintendo a slap on the wrist for it's Nazi-like practices with the NES
Nintendo was the mob when Yamauchi was in his prime. Look at their mascots afterall; Mario and Luigi.