Dutch wrote:I don't see much of a problem with Activision's decision, though I also don't see why it is an issue for them. Rock Band was essentially a flop, it doesn't come close to competing with Guitar Hero in terms of sales. I don't know why Activision would actually do something that would put Rock Band in the news. Then again, it lowers the price of a potential future competing product so no one else on PS3 will want to try it. I somehow doubt Rock Band will ever compete though.
I'll take it by the subject of this response that it's in the wrong thread.
However, it's far too early to tell if Rock Band is a failure. If they're sold anywhere near the 200,000 figure that's being tossed around in November, you can't call it anything but a runaway success, even if only half of those are the bundle set. That's $100,000 of a $170 game or $17M in revenue in a week and a half...and that wouldn't even include the other $6M for the standalones ($60 x 100,000). Yeah, it ain't GH numbers but it's not like this game:
a) has the name of GH
b) is available on as many systems
c) nearly as affordable as GH
Wait 'til we see the figures for November and over the course of time. Just because it don't do quite as well as GH don't mean it ain't a success. The fact that the Canadian release just got delayed by a couple of days (to Dec 20 at EB although Futureshop has it at Dec 22) beyond the original 4 week delay should tell you something about the demand for it.
There is room for more than one success story there. Is the 360 an unsuccessful system just 'cause the Wii is pounding it in sales?
At the end of the day, this little stance by Activision will only hurt the consumers. There's no reason for it other than control and sticking it to the other, especially not the way it's playing out. It's not like Rock Band guitars are working with GH or Activision plans any patch to make them work.