Page 1 of 1

Blue Dragon for 27 dollars

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:34 am
by RentCavalier
Worth it or not worth it?

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 1:34 am
by Blotus
I think Kali's the only one here who has played more than the demo.

The demo made me ill. The characters are disgusting to look at and listen to. Apply only if you're a Toriyama lover or a weeaboo, as it seems to be a very standard JRPG.

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 1:45 am
by bovine
where is this deal? I would get it for that price to see if the girlfriend likes it or not.

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:59 am
by SineSwiper
My prediction: headed to the Walmart bargain bin in less than 6 months.

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:53 am
by Zeus
SineSwiper wrote:My prediction: headed to the Walmart bargain bin in less than 6 months.
I'd say even sooner than that. It should hit $30 new relatively shortly which means $20 used at a non-EB store. So that would mean I could get it for around $15 at which point it may be worth it for what seems to be considered a mediocre RPG

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:58 am
by Julius Seeker
Black Lotus wrote:I think Kali's the only one here who has played more than the demo.

The demo made me ill. The characters are disgusting to look at and listen to. Apply only if you're a Toriyama lover or a weeaboo, as it seems to be a very standard JRPG.
This one is quite below standard if the reviews are correct.

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:01 am
by Blotus
Surprisingly it has a GR average of 77%. I would have thought it would be closer to 65%.

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:40 am
by Julius Seeker
Hmmm, perhaps it isn't as bad as it looks; I noticed that Gamespot gave it a 6, and that is probably the only review I read of it. a 77% would put it on par with the first Shadow Hearts (which had interesting concepts, but altogether flawed; in other words, if you are interested in the concept, the game might be worth a lot more to people who can get around the flaws if they like the concepts)[/i]

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:24 am
by Chris
Dutch wrote:
Black Lotus wrote:I think Kali's the only one here who has played more than the demo.

The demo made me ill. The characters are disgusting to look at and listen to. Apply only if you're a Toriyama lover or a weeaboo, as it seems to be a very standard JRPG.
This one is quite below standard if the reviews are correct.
it's not even below standard. it's just a standard generic game. there is pretty much nothing new or exciting it's just extremely generic

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:51 am
by Zeus
Lost Odyssey is Mistwalker's big one and it's coming out in February. It's supposed to be pretty good. Why not just take the money you were gong to spend on Blue Dragon and subsidize that one instead?

Then you can beat Lost Odyssey and use the higher trade-in value towards what should be a discounted Blue Dragon by then. That should leave you with some additional trade value for something else.

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:53 am
by Blotus
It's like you're an accountant or something! :)

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:35 pm
by Zeus
Black Lotus wrote:It's like you're an accountant or something! :)
Weird, huh? :)

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:43 pm
by SineSwiper
Can I claim it on my taxes?

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:44 pm
by Julius Seeker
I was under the impression that Blue Dragon was the big project for 360? It is getting better reviews than Lost Odyssey so far.

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:59 pm
by SineSwiper
I'm under the impression that Square should fire everybody from the ENIX side and rename themselves to Squaresoft.

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:48 pm
by Zeus
SineSwiper wrote:I'm under the impression that Square should fire everybody from the ENIX side and rename themselves to Squaresoft.
Enix games, although not many, are extremely well performers from a business point of view. It was a brilliant move IMO

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:06 pm
by Don
I don't think Enix was ever that profitable, but rather Squre lost about a zillion dollar from the ill fated FF the Movie.

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:23 pm
by Kupek
I'm under the impression that Enix is hitting Square like a pinata until FF remakes come out.

Alternative analogy: Enix is force-molting Square to produce FF remakes.

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:30 pm
by Andrew, Killer Bee
Kupek wrote:I'm under the impression that Enix is hitting Square like a pinata until FF remakes come out.
Hahahaha! I get this impression also. Poor old Square. They're definitely the bottom in that relationship.

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:46 pm
by SineSwiper
I could easily say the same thing for Dragon Quest and its similar ilk. After all, we are talking about Blue Dragon, which might as well be some other DQ game.

PostPosted:Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:56 pm
by Blotus
SineSwiper wrote:I could easily say the same thing for Dragon Quest and its similar ilk. After all, we are talking about Blue Dragon, which might as well be some other DQ game.
That was basically the point of it. It's been said that Mistwalker was funded to make Dragon Quest (Blue Dragon) and Final Fantasy (Lost Odyssey) ripoffs.

PostPosted:Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:38 am
by Don
I heard even the manga for Blue Dragon sucked, even though it's drawn by the same guy who did Death Note and HNG whose name is usually enough to at least fool some people into buying stuff.

PostPosted:Tue Jan 29, 2008 6:42 am
by Julius Seeker
SineSwiper wrote:I'm under the impression that Square should fire everybody from the ENIX side and rename themselves to Squaresoft.
I think Square would find that difficult considering Enix pretty much owns them.

On Blue Dragon, is it really like Dragon Quest? Because I quite like Dragon Quest 8, it is among my very favourite RPGs in the past 5 years.

PostPosted:Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:39 am
by Zeus
You guys do know that in the merger, Enix was the dominant party, right? It was something on the order of 1.8:1 ratio of Enix to Square shares for the new company if my memory serves me right.

Enix is a money making machine. They may not be as big, particularly overseas, but they are profitable as fuck.

PostPosted:Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:03 pm
by Don
Enix makes money from what... Dragon Quest? And what else? They have some manga stuff going that's like printing money, but it's not anywhere near a best seller. They have remakes on handhelds that's probably like printing money too, but then FF caught on to pretty quick.

If I recall Square put some absolutely stupid amount of money in their Hawaii studio that basically accomplished nothing. The fact they even have half of Enix's capitalization says a lot about how big they are.

PostPosted:Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:33 pm
by RentCavalier
So, how did this turn into a dissection of the Enix company, considering Enix HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH BLUE DRAGON?

Well, since I may have to get a new wireless hub for my computer, I prolly won't get this game yet--though I am curious to play it at some point. Maybe Lost Odyssey...

PostPosted:Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:18 pm
by Zeus
Don Wang wrote:Enix makes money from what... Dragon Quest? And what else? They have some manga stuff going that's like printing money, but it's not anywhere near a best seller. They have remakes on handhelds that's probably like printing money too, but then FF caught on to pretty quick.

If I recall Square put some absolutely stupid amount of money in their Hawaii studio that basically accomplished nothing. The fact they even have half of Enix's capitalization says a lot about how big they are.
If a smaller company is dominant in the merger of a larger company that means it's a stronger company. Size don't equal strength.

Not sure what else they do (for Konami, games aren't the majority of their business, maybe it was the same with Enix?), but it's rather obvious that Enix was on much stronger footing from a business sense than Square.

And from what I've seen, the FF remakes don't seem to touch the DQ ones in terms of sales. DQ4 for PSX in Japan sold something like 2 million copies, it was insane. Them Japanese luvs their DQ.

PostPosted:Wed Jan 30, 2008 7:31 pm
by Julius Seeker
Well, you can't really attribute any development to Enix, they are a publishing company. The companies who made Dragon Quest are mainly Chunsoft and Tri-Ace, and a number of other studios. Enix is primarilly not a videogame company. The breakdown of Enix's revenue is as follows;

Total: 163.4 billion yen (1.53 billion U.S. dollars)

Video games: 64.9 billion yen
Mobile content: 7.7 billion yen
Publication: 11.2 billion yen
Other/entertainment: 79.8 billion yen

PostPosted:Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:04 am
by Flip
Dutch wrote:Well, you can't really attribute any development to Enix, they are a publishing company. The companies who made Dragon Quest are mainly Chunsoft and Tri-Ace, and a number of other studios. Enix is primarilly not a videogame company. The breakdown of Enix's revenue is as follows;

Total: 163.4 billion yen (1.53 billion U.S. dollars)

Video games: 64.9 billion yen
Mobile content: 7.7 billion yen
Publication: 11.2 billion yen
Other/entertainment: 79.8 billion yen

Ah, that elusive other/entertainment component... what the hell is in it?

PostPosted:Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:30 am
by RentCavalier
Porn.

lots of porn.

PostPosted:Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:34 am
by Julius Seeker
It could be porn. It could be toys as well; such as action figures. Probably a large number of things.

PostPosted:Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:03 am
by RentCavalier
No.

Just porn.

PostPosted:Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:37 am
by SineSwiper
Oh, Metal Slime! Me so horny!

PostPosted:Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:13 pm
by Julius Seeker
In addition, Enix is expanding and is currently in the process of acquiring development companies in Japan, North America, and Europe.

PostPosted:Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:36 pm
by Zeus
SineSwiper wrote:Oh, Metal Slime! Me so horny!
*tink* *tink* *tink* *tink* *tink* *tink*

PostPosted:Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:56 pm
by RentCavalier
What..that's it?

*Metal Slime Runs Away*