Page 1 of 1
Updated version of Okami, I want this game!
PostPosted:Sat Apr 12, 2008 10:09 am
by Julius Seeker
<a href="
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2-JmEY4IeU">Video mini-review</a>
It looks really really fun! Wind Waker fun (Or even Majora's Mask, and that game was a LOT of fun, maybe more so than any other in the series), which was better than Twilight Princess in my opinion.
I can't wait to try out the painting system using the Wii remote.
On a side note, it looks like Mario Kart will have to wait.
PostPosted:Sat Apr 12, 2008 3:09 pm
by RentCavalier
God damn that's beautiful.
Once May hits, I'm ordering this, FES and prolly Mario Kart Wii.
PostPosted:Sat Apr 12, 2008 3:56 pm
by bovine
it's a great game. Yalls be crazy for not picking it up back on the PS2.
PostPosted:Sat Apr 12, 2008 5:02 pm
by Zeus
bovine wrote:it's a great game. Yalls be crazy for not picking it up back on the PS2.
Fucking thing never dropped in price. I was waiting to get it then I heard about the Wii version
PostPosted:Sun Apr 13, 2008 12:05 pm
by Julius Seeker
Truthfully, I didn't really pay attention to it. I had no idea how awesome it looked. I wasn't even considering the Wii version until I saw that review video either. Tuesday for $39.99 is certainly what I wanted to hear though =)
Capcom seems to be insane when pricing their titles, since the Gamecube RE1-remake they seem to have been delivering very high quality titles at VERY low prices.
PostPosted:Mon Apr 14, 2008 7:51 am
by SineSwiper
Seeker doesn't buy any game unless it's associated with Nintendo. Of course he never heard of the PS2 version. He must have ignored all of the threads talking about it for the last two years, too.
PostPosted:Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:44 am
by Julius Seeker
SineSwiper wrote:Seeker doesn't buy any game unless it's associated with Nintendo. Of course he never heard of the PS2 version. He must have ignored all of the threads talking about it for the last two years, too.
Sine doesn't make a post unless it's infested with ignorance. Of course he is clueless about the difference between a lack of interest and a lack of knowing about a game's existence. He must have completely ignored rational and logical thought for the last 28 years.
PS. Show me all of these Okami threads.
PostPosted:Mon Apr 14, 2008 7:31 pm
by SineSwiper
PostPosted:Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:52 pm
by RentCavalier
PostPosted:Tue Apr 15, 2008 1:25 am
by Julius Seeker
Worst attempt at argument ever!
1) Only TWO of those threads are about Okami, TWO!!!!! What the shit are all these other links for?
2) One of those threads is THIS thread!
3) The one listed as the most relavent thread was posted a month ago in anticipation of the Wii release, not exactly something that will convince a person to buy the PS2 version. On top of that, it barely discusses the game.
PostPosted:Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:18 am
by RentCavalier
Dutch wrote:
Worst attempt at argument ever!
1) Only TWO of those threads are about Okami, TWO!!!!! What the shit are all these other links for?
2) One of those threads is THIS thread!
3) The one listed as the most relavent thread was posted a month ago in anticipation of the Wii release, not exactly something that will convince a person to buy the PS2 version. On top of that, it barely discusses the game.
Also own'd?
PostPosted:Tue Apr 15, 2008 8:52 am
by SineSwiper
Dutch wrote:1) Only TWO of those threads are about Okami, TWO!!!!! What the shit are all these other links for?
Well, we talk about all kinds of shit off-topic. It's nothing new.
Dutch wrote:2) One of those threads is THIS thread!
All that proves is that I'm lazy. Which I am. Congratulations!
Dutch wrote:3) The one listed as the most relavent thread was posted a month ago in anticipation of the Wii release, not exactly something that will convince a person to buy the PS2 version. On top of that, it barely discusses the game.
Try 2 1/2 years ago. You can read dates, can you? The point is that we've talking about it, quite a bit, so you should have looked into it.
Hell, don't look at us. Reviewers have talked about it and given it 10/10 or 5 stars or A+ ratings. Shouldn't that have peaked your interest? Or do you only read Nintendo Power for reviews?
http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/adventure/okami/review.html
http://ps2.ign.com/articles/733/733122p1.html
http://www.psxextreme.com/scripts/revie ... ?revID=497
http://ps2.gamespy.com/playstation-2/ok ... 301p1.html
http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3153760
http://www.gamerevolution.com/review/ps2/okami
http://www.g4tv.com/xplay/videos/13461/ ... eview.html
Game Informer: 9.5/10
EGM: 9.2/10
The New York Fucking Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/techn ... 1game.html
And millions of other reviewers:
http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/ps2/okami
PostPosted:Tue Apr 15, 2008 11:14 am
by Julius Seeker
1. I only read IGN and Gamespot (and on occasion Magicbox), I don't care about any of those other sites you mentioned. I stopped reading any kind of print magazine about the time videogamespot.com came online.
2. Gamespot and IGN gave Okami a 9.0 and a 9.1 respectively; not something I would even consider looking at in light of the fact that I already have tons of other stuff to play.
3. Where is all this discussion on the game you are talking about? I don't really see anything about the game at all outside of this thread.
You're whole argument is pointless and retarded. Your main argument is "Seeker doesn't buy any game unless it's associated with Nintendo."; which I am sorry to say, just shows that you are lacking somewhere mentally if you are indeed that ignorant. You seemed to post it for no real reason but to be ignorant. You backed it up with an argument stating that I should have known everything about a very obscure title that I just happened to catch a video review for; considering the title bombed completely, what do you have to say about all the other gamers (the 5000 who actually bought the game in North America aside) who didn't buy it?