But you'll be OK with spending real people money to play MGS4 Online?bovine wrote:after much trying, I was finally able to get in. I'm just toiling about in my "apartment" and trying to download another area. The customization options are sparse. Looks like they probably want me to buy things with real people money. Bovine does not want to spend real people money here.
huh? I don't know what you are referring to.Zeus wrote:But you'll be OK with spending real people money to play MGS4 Online?bovine wrote:after much trying, I was finally able to get in. I'm just toiling about in my "apartment" and trying to download another area. The customization options are sparse. Looks like they probably want me to buy things with real people money. Bovine does not want to spend real people money here.
Zeus wrote: And it had better be great. I want to point and laugh at Microshaft when they're forced to drop the Live Gold fee
/points and laughs at Zeu$bovine wrote: Bovine's final decision on home - probably the lamest thing that I have ever experienced on a console with such hype behind it. It is literally empty of any content that anyone would want. I suggest you try it just to see how ridiculous it actually is.
What I'm saying is that you don't want to spend money on superficial microtransactions that don't do anything other than affect the aesthetics of your online "world". I can understand that, it's stupid. Yet you seem to have no issues paying a subscription fee to play half of the game you bought on a rival system.bovine wrote:huh? I don't know what you are referring to.Zeus wrote:But you'll be OK with spending real people money to play MGS4 Online?bovine wrote:after much trying, I was finally able to get in. I'm just toiling about in my "apartment" and trying to download another area. The customization options are sparse. Looks like they probably want me to buy things with real people money. Bovine does not want to spend real people money here.
Bovine's final decision on home - probably the lamest thing that I have ever experienced on a console with such hype behind it. It is literally empty of any content that anyone would want. I suggest you try it just to see how ridiculous it actually is.
Give it time. It's just starting.Tessian wrote:Zeus wrote: And it had better be great. I want to point and laugh at Microshaft when they're forced to drop the Live Gold fee/points and laughs at Zeu$bovine wrote: Bovine's final decision on home - probably the lamest thing that I have ever experienced on a console with such hype behind it. It is literally empty of any content that anyone would want. I suggest you try it just to see how ridiculous it actually is.
Ha ha!
sorry... couldn't resist
If $50 a year is the cost to play with my friends (because there are very few people with a ps3 that I know), have a robust online system, use a superior (in my opinion) controller, and play great exclusives online, then I'll certainly pay it. MGS4 and Resistance 1 and 2 have pretty awful multiplayer. Some people may give critical acclaim to R2's coop and vs modes, but I really disliked them, especially coupled with the extra-awkward ps3 controller. I have trouble finding games I want to play on the only game on the ps3 taht I want to play online: wipeout hd. I'd much rather pay to play gears, gears 2, halo3, and castle crashers with you guys and my friends (are you crazy obscure internet people my friends? ah sure, why not?). I'd like it if it was free, and I also think it SHOULD be free, but it is not. I'm paying for it because I see a value in it. Should that already be included in the price I pay for a game? Yer damn right it should, but it is not. I agree with you, I just don't feel as strongly about it.Zeus wrote:What I'm saying is that you don't want to spend money on superficial microtransactions that don't do anything other than affect the aesthetics of your online "world". I can understand that, it's stupid. Yet you seem to have no issues paying a subscription fee to play half of the game you bought on a rival system.bovine wrote:huh? I don't know what you are referring to.Zeus wrote: But you'll be OK with spending real people money to play MGS4 Online?
Bovine's final decision on home - probably the lamest thing that I have ever experienced on a console with such hype behind it. It is literally empty of any content that anyone would want. I suggest you try it just to see how ridiculous it actually is.
I just wanted to point out to you that it's a bit silly. I personally would rather have a sparse, silly "virtual world" that was barely functional and be able to play my games online for free than have to pay to play half the game I just paid full price for.
Again, the amount is not the point. But we won't go there again.Kupek wrote:It's $4.17 a month. It's not even the cost of two pints at a bar.Zeus wrote:Yet you seem to have no issues paying a subscription fee to play half of the game you bought on a rival system.
I stopped myself from expanding on it in the reply above so not really. I was just pointing out it wasn't based on cost.Kupek wrote:I think you already did.
For sure. They're fucking up huge and I think they're sure they can eventually pull out of it 'cause of the "Playstation brand". They're being quite arrogant IMO. They're saying "but we're tracking along the PS2 sales so we're doing good". Well, not when your competition is Ishing the shit out of you and you were the undisputed market leader very recently you're not. That's grounds for dismissal in most companies (and sports :-).Eric wrote:Sony has failed and disappointed this generation repeatedly.
Tycho wrote: There are things about Home that are simply beyond my understanding. Chief among these bizarre maneuvers is the idea that, when manufacturing their flimsy dystopia, they actually ported the pernicious notion of scarcity from our world into their digital one. This is like having the ability to shape being from non-being at the subatomic level, and the first thing you decide to make is AIDS.