The Shrine

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '><b>Link:</b> <a href="http://gamespot.com/gamespot/stories/ne ... inally?</a>

It's about friggin' time! Let's see if it actually goes through this time</div>

<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>He's confirmed that he's retiring in June, and that a group of appointed individuals will run Nintendo, he is retiring as one of the richest people in the world. from IGN</div>

<div style='font: 11pt ; text-align: left; '>Hopefully those indiviuals will allow more violent content on the console, and get some deals that 3rd party companies will like.</div>

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Yeah, me too. I'm sick of hearing about all those kiddy games like Soul Calibur and Resident Evil being released on the system</div>

<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>All Nintendo does is publish kiddy titles like Metroid Prime, Perfect Dark 0, Conkers Revenge, and Eternal Darkness.</div>

<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>Now I wonder if this means June 2002, or June 2067?</div>

<div style='font: 11pt ; text-align: left; '>I'm not even gonna get into it with you 2 Nintendo trolls. 6 games compared to vast library of games on the PSX1&2, and even the X-Box.</div>

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Point is, you ARE getting lots of "mature" games on the system. Only those who listen to the Sony and Microshaft propoganda don't think so. Just because Nintendo themselves do "kiddie" games doesn't mean that's all there's available for the system</div>

<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>You asked if Nintendo would allow for more violent content, well, they are themselves publishing at least 4 very high quality M-rated games, there's your question answered. Why exactly are you attempting to argue it? Who's the Troll here?</div>

<div style='font: 10pt "Times New Roman"; text-align: left; '>He's saying the PS2 has a much vaster library than the GC (whether it's new or not isn't the issue) and thus has a higher percentage of what can be considered violent games. He's also correct. The 6 or so oft-mentioned titles for the N64 don't propotionally compare to that of the PSX, either.</div>

<div style='font: 11pt ; text-align: left; '>Exactly.</div>

<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>This has to do with the question on whether Nintendo will be allowing for adult games, how? Does the fact that there are less adult games on the system mean Nintendo doesn't allow them? Would 6 Resident Evil games be coming out in the next 12 months if M rated games weren't allowed on the system?</div>

<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>One more Nintendo Published M rated game, Too Human</div>

<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>Maybe you can look at this from another angle. On Mr.Miyamato's recent European swing he has stated in interviews that he has been going around TELLING third parties that when Nintendo wants a different style game they don't necessarily mean that it needs to be "Kiddified".</div>

<div style='font: 10pt "Times New Roman"; text-align: left; '>You can shoot off all you want when they actually come out. I personally won't be listening because I see no point if defending a gaming company with unwavering faith.</div>

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>There are no less than half a dozen people that defend a system with unwavering faith here, yet only two get singled out...</div>

<div style='font: 10pt "arial narrow"; text-align: left; padding: 0% 5% 0% 5%; '>I count two. That is, those that "defend a system [or company] with unwavering faith", not those singled out (and you're not one of those, you NintendHo =P).</div>

<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>Whatever! about as relevant to the topic as diet Coke.</div>