Page 1 of 1

Microsoft is abandoning the set-top box idea

PostPosted:Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:02 am
by Zeus
Looks like only Sony's interested in this now...

http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/04/27 ... 23080.html

PostPosted:Thu Apr 28, 2005 8:26 pm
by SineSwiper
What's the set-top box?

PostPosted:Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:08 pm
by Zeus
A set-top box is a theoretical all-in-one electronic device, kinda like they keep saying the PS2 is. It's supposed to be a DVD player, cable box, DVR, hooks up to your camera, internet, etc.

PostPosted:Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:37 pm
by Julius Seeker
I never liked the idea of all these extra worthless features on consoles which only really served to jack up the price. Good for Microsoft.

PostPosted:Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:09 pm
by Torgo
About time. I don't want a console to cost extra just so it can be a half-assed computer or DVD player.

PostPosted:Fri Apr 29, 2005 4:15 am
by SineSwiper
Cable boxes/DVRs aren't standardized anyway, so what's the fucking point? All-in-one devices don't work anyway. Just look at the Mac.

PostPosted:Fri Apr 29, 2005 8:30 am
by Julius Seeker
Either way, I just hope I am not spending 300 dollars on the next gen consoles when they could and should be 200 dollars.

PostPosted:Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:02 am
by Kupek
SineSwiper wrote:Cable boxes/DVRs aren't standardized anyway, so what's the fucking point? All-in-one devices don't work anyway. Just look at the Mac.
I don't get your point. The Mac is a computer and it's advertised as one.

PostPosted:Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:36 am
by SineSwiper
I was referring to the "upgrading means tossing the Mac" part of it. If I need better video, I'm not going to buy another computer.

PostPosted:Sat Apr 30, 2005 9:55 am
by Kupek
SineSwiper wrote:I was referring to the "upgrading means tossing the Mac" part of it. If I need better video, I'm not going to buy another computer.
The same is true for any laptop.

PostPosted:Sat Apr 30, 2005 10:25 am
by SineSwiper
Sort of a necessary evil. As soon as laptops become more modularized, it's "adapt or die".

PostPosted:Sat Apr 30, 2005 3:44 pm
by Julius Seeker
I don't know, I've never actually needed to upgrade my computer before. Well, not int he last 10 years.

PostPosted:Sun May 01, 2005 5:46 am
by SineSwiper
The 90's called, they want their 386 back.

PostPosted:Sun May 01, 2005 9:40 am
by Zeus
Well, I've had my comp for 5 years now and the only thing that I've put in it is more RAM. It's only now starting to show its age and mostly 'cause I'm doing video conversion. If you don't game, it's not really that necessary to upgrade more than once every 5 years as long as you build a proper comp. I have a few friends with 386's (they got them for free) and they're perfectly fine for surfing, even some of the heavier flash sites. You just have to wait a tad bit extra, that's all. Mind you, it won't work overly well if they decide to play games or for downloading and converting media.

PostPosted:Mon May 02, 2005 10:08 am
by Lox
I agree with Zeus.

I gave my fiancee my Dell with a 400mhz Celeron in it that I got in 1999 and she's still using it running Windows XP. I put more RAM in it and a CD Burner and that's it. She doesn't game so it's perfect for her.

PostPosted:Tue May 03, 2005 1:15 am
by SineSwiper
Yeah, I had a 900MHz for a long time. Just recently replaced it with a 2GHz or so because of bad memory (or motherboard; I don't know which). But, 10 years is a long time. I think 486s were still selling back then.

PostPosted:Tue May 03, 2005 6:48 am
by Julius Seeker
I used my old Pentium 400 mhz as my internet computer for the longest time. I never really had any problems with games either until probably the last year or so. Warcraft III even worked fine on it. Recently though I have replaced it with a 3 ghz pentium 4. I also have a mac as well, I think I prefer it in many ways over the PC, the OS seems to be much better done. The problem with macs is compatability, and that will always be a problem for them.

PostPosted:Tue May 03, 2005 11:46 am
by the Gray
Zeus, you LIE!

http://www.geekcoffee.net/archives/2005 ... _prom.html

Bill is saying he definately sees the new 360 as an entertainment hub, or set-top box.

PostPosted:Tue May 03, 2005 12:46 pm
by Zeus
Hmm, this is a quote from my article:

"Bach has no love for the all-in-one entertainment devices that were once supposed to be the future of the industry; he's only interested in adding functions that enhance the gameplay experience."

That's from the prez of Xbox at Microshaft.

Maybe they're thinking along different lines, he and Gates? Odd thing is, the articles are dated the same day as well.

Guess we'll have to wait until next Thursday to find out

PostPosted:Tue May 03, 2005 1:19 pm
by Flip
I never liked the idea of all these extra worthless features on consoles which only really served to jack up the price. Good for Microsoft.

It depends on the hybrid for me. Cell phone/PDA... worthless, cell phone/camera, sure why not. Game console/DVD player, god knows i used the hell out of both, Game console/stereo, worthless.

Prtable game device/movie player/mp3 player, THATS GOLD JERRY, GOLD! :)