BLASPHEMY!Kupek wrote:Zeus, I hate to break to it you, but all of those cartoons we liked as kids? They really weren't that good to being with. This actually looks <i>less</i> silly than the TMNT cartoons I remember.
WTF are you talking about? It looks fucking great!Zeus wrote:As another piece of my childhoods gets molested
I've actually been watching a lot of those old cartoons from back when I was a kid recently. I got the GI Joe and Transformers sets when they were released and got about half way through both before work took over. Yeah, they're a bit cheesy in an 80's sort of way, but they're still very entertaining and good. And TMNT was always pretty fun and still is. I actually saw the original movie a few months ago on the satellite and very much enjoyed it. Sure, some of it is nostalgia, but it's not like I enjoy every old movie or cartoon I used to watch. I can barely watch the Smurfs anymore and that used to be one of my favs. But Darkwing Duck still rules, just not quite as much.Kupek wrote:Zeus, I hate to break to it you, but all of those cartoons we liked as kids? They really weren't that good to being with. This actually looks <i>less</i> silly than the TMNT cartoons I remember.
Worst which how?Zeus wrote:I just don't like how they're changing them for the worst. I'm all for updating (I'm one of the few who didn't mind some of the updates to Star Wars), but this is exploitation of a recognized brand. Same beef I have with the Transformers movie being updated improperly to be exploited by the media moguls.
But I agree with Nev, it looks very nice from a purely graphical point of view
Bay does blow ridiculous chunks.SineSwiper wrote:TMNT isn't being made by Michael Bay, so what are you bitching about, Zeus?
Pearl Harbor still sucks.
Yeah, like those horrible TV/comic-to-movie transformations by Hollywood, including:Zeus wrote:I hope to hell I'm proven wrong on this one, but just going by Hollywood in general, it'll get brutalized.
I do admit that recently they've gotten better as the nerds have become more respectable directors (I agree with the first three on your list, but Jackass just blows, X-Men 1 was decent, 2 was very good, 3 sucked, South Park was just a glorified episodes, as was Beavis and Butthead), but there's just as many bad ones, if not more. Still nothing's provenSineSwiper wrote:Yeah, like those horrible TV/comic-to-movie transformations by Hollywood, including:Zeus wrote:I hope to hell I'm proven wrong on this one, but just going by Hollywood in general, it'll get brutalized.
Spiderman
Sin City
Batman Begins
Jackass
X-Men
South Park
Beavis and Butthead
As long as it's not a known-to-be-horrible director, Hollywood has been doing pretty good with TV or comic movie conversions fairly recently.
I saw the movie in theatres and it felt like a large episode to me. And like their episodes, I find 1/3rd hilarious and the other 2/3rds boring and silly. I like their normal movies (Team America, Orgazmo, Baseketball) much more than South Park.Kupek wrote:South Park was just a glorified episode? Did you <i>listen</i> to the songs in it? They were hilarious, surprisingly clever and creative. Keep in mind "Blame Canada" got nominated for an Oscar.
The Borg are easily the most sinister enemies that Space-Fantasy has created.Eric wrote:As far as Star Trek movies go I really enjoyed First Contact.
Yeah, that was the only one of the Next Gen ones that's really good (I very much enjoyed that one). Nemesis broke the even-odd rule (all the even numbered films are good, the odds aren't; Nemesis was tolerable) and I don't have faith in Abrahms for the next one (this is the man who created Alias and Lost after all). So maybe the one after?Eric wrote:As far as Star Trek movies go I really enjoyed First Contact.
I don't think that "rule" has seriously been applied since Star Trek 5.Zeus wrote:Nemesis broke the even-odd rule (all the even numbered films are good, the odds aren't
I prefer Marvel's Phalanx.The Seeker wrote:The Borg are easily the most sinister enemies that Space-Fantasy has created.
Wrath of Khan, The Voyage Home, The Undiscovered Country, and First Contact were the best. Incidentally, those were 2, 4, 6, and 8 in the series. Nemesis was #10 and broke the rule.The Seeker wrote:I don't think that "rule" has seriously been applied since Star Trek 5.Zeus wrote:Nemesis broke the even-odd rule (all the even numbered films are good, the odds aren't
I disagree with it anyways, I found part 2, 3, and 4 to all be good. The only really bad ones are 1, 5, and 10.
bovine wrote:WHOA! yeah! seeing that post brought back a lot of memories...... phalanx are pretty pimp.
I had to look that up. They are based in the Xmen world which is not really Space Fantasy at all (they go into space a few times). Ironically, you listed a enemy (supposedly more sinister than the Borg) that seems to be a rip-off of the Borg. Though, whether they are more sinister enemies or not, I have no idea.SineSwiper wrote:I prefer Marvel's Phalanx.The Seeker wrote:The Borg are easily the most sinister enemies that Space-Fantasy has created.