-Insert Inspiring Quote-
You don't understand MMA, this was long ago estalished. If you SERIOUSLY thought that UFC, before the Yakuza incident last year in Pride, was better than Pride then you really don't know much about the sport.kali o. wrote:I told you that guy was nowhere near the caliber of fighter you claimed. Now when Liddel tears apart Rampage, I can bump your "Pride more skilled than UFC fighters" thread and, as usual, bask in the always-right-aura that seems to follow my opinions.
"Not knowing much about the sport" equates to no participating in the WWF-vs-ECW like arguments you're so fond of in various message boards accross the net, so you'll forgive me if I don't find offense.The Seeker wrote: You don't understand MMA, this was long ago estalished. If you SERIOUSLY thought that UFC, before the Yakuza incident last year in Pride, was better than Pride then you really don't know much about the sport.
By the way, Chuck already fought Rampage in Pride: http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/se ... ge-jackson
Really, I would like to see you try to explain this one. Then I will respond.kali o. wrote:Too bad the Pride format sucks.
kali o. wrote:Pride has never had "better" competition
So if a declined Rampage dominates this fight against an "improved" Chuck, then this would look REALLY bad for your argument.kali o. wrote: As for Chuck, as i *already* said, he was a different fighter back then and has improved far beyond Rampage (who has declined). I'd place easy money on Liddel...wouldn't you?
I'm not entrained by the barbarism. I'm entertained by the athleticism, skill and personal dedication. I train in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bjj">BJJ</a>, and to some extent, general MMA. I've trained in two different towns, and I've helped fighters prepare for amateur MMA matches in both towns. It's not just something I watch, it's something I do.bovine wrote:By "vice-like" I meant sort of a satirical jab at you fellows to make you all feel bad for being entertained by the barbarism of UFC.