Back in high school, I had a history teacher who went to Russia back when it was the USSR. He had to pull some strings to get there since it was the Cold War after all. He brought some students who were blabbering about freedom and capitalism, so he thinks the KGB might be on to him. So the class asked him did he see any KGB spies, and he said if he know who the KGB spies are, then they wouldn't belong in the KGB in the first place.
Now I'm not saying if you're watching an action flick like James Bond or whatever it's wrong for a spy guy to appear in a black spy suit and gets seen a mile away. Obviously these movies aren't really about the fine art of covert operations. But what bothers me is that anything that attempts to pass itself as realistic and people don't seem to even research on this for knowledge you can probably find on the Learning Channel. It should be pretty obvious if an FBI/KGB/whatever agent is onto you, it'd be pretty difficult to spot one let alone outwit one. Obviously the most recent example I can think of is Death Note, but there's plenty of other examples of this where your best elite agents from top spying agencies are pretty much worse than an average kid for whatever you need them to do.
Is this because it'd be tough to have a story of any kind if spies are actually as good as real spies, or is it because people simply don't even research? A lot of the time I got the feeling that it's the latter, that whoever wrote/draw about the dumb spy probably thinks he can spot one if one was on him.
Now I'm not saying if you're watching an action flick like James Bond or whatever it's wrong for a spy guy to appear in a black spy suit and gets seen a mile away. Obviously these movies aren't really about the fine art of covert operations. But what bothers me is that anything that attempts to pass itself as realistic and people don't seem to even research on this for knowledge you can probably find on the Learning Channel. It should be pretty obvious if an FBI/KGB/whatever agent is onto you, it'd be pretty difficult to spot one let alone outwit one. Obviously the most recent example I can think of is Death Note, but there's plenty of other examples of this where your best elite agents from top spying agencies are pretty much worse than an average kid for whatever you need them to do.
Is this because it'd be tough to have a story of any kind if spies are actually as good as real spies, or is it because people simply don't even research? A lot of the time I got the feeling that it's the latter, that whoever wrote/draw about the dumb spy probably thinks he can spot one if one was on him.