Here we are in the new age of car commercials. Only six months ago, all of the commercials were talking about how "It's not more power than you need, just more power than you're used to." The Hummer was talking about their new H3. And while cars like the Prius were flying off the lot, there just wasn't a sense that, at least publically, that the rest of the car industry cared. The commercials still reflected that "big car = big dick" persona.
Now, the public reaches this magic $4/gal number. They weren't concerned when gas was $1/gal or $2/gal or even $3/gal, but suddenly it's $4/gal and everything somehow changes. Everybody is talking about how gas is NOW too expensive, even expensive enough to actually *GASP* change their habits. People are actually considering buying motorcycles or hybrids. Hummer is on the verge of going bankrupt, and in a few years time, we will be down to two US car companies.
Now, every car commercial is talking about their gas mileage, their magical MPG. You literally can't see a car commercial (besides maybe a few of the luxary cars) that doesn't advertise its MPG. But, this isn't a sudden change in technology. Besides the hybrids, the cars haven't changed. It takes years to develop a new line of cars. The commercials have changed, and this lag between the two has created something like this:
Okay, I can't find a video for it, but it's for a 2008 Buick Lucerne. It starts out with some guy talking near a pump and saying "These days the only thing that matters is this number" (pointing at the pump price after a fill up). He talks about how the Buick Lucerne gets higher highway gas mileage than this Chrysler 300 Touring Edition. The fine print as he's saying this is actually pretty clear to read, as the font is bigger than your typical fine print. It says:
"25 MPG 2008 EPA estimated highway" (showing the Buick)
"2008 EPA estimated mileage: 24 hwy" (showing the Chrysler)
Yes, this is the new low. Comparing a single MPG higher on a car with a shitty fuel economy to begin with, especially with two cars that nobody gives a flying fuck about.
Can you smell the desperation in the air?
Now, the public reaches this magic $4/gal number. They weren't concerned when gas was $1/gal or $2/gal or even $3/gal, but suddenly it's $4/gal and everything somehow changes. Everybody is talking about how gas is NOW too expensive, even expensive enough to actually *GASP* change their habits. People are actually considering buying motorcycles or hybrids. Hummer is on the verge of going bankrupt, and in a few years time, we will be down to two US car companies.
Now, every car commercial is talking about their gas mileage, their magical MPG. You literally can't see a car commercial (besides maybe a few of the luxary cars) that doesn't advertise its MPG. But, this isn't a sudden change in technology. Besides the hybrids, the cars haven't changed. It takes years to develop a new line of cars. The commercials have changed, and this lag between the two has created something like this:
Okay, I can't find a video for it, but it's for a 2008 Buick Lucerne. It starts out with some guy talking near a pump and saying "These days the only thing that matters is this number" (pointing at the pump price after a fill up). He talks about how the Buick Lucerne gets higher highway gas mileage than this Chrysler 300 Touring Edition. The fine print as he's saying this is actually pretty clear to read, as the font is bigger than your typical fine print. It says:
"25 MPG 2008 EPA estimated highway" (showing the Buick)
"2008 EPA estimated mileage: 24 hwy" (showing the Chrysler)
Yes, this is the new low. Comparing a single MPG higher on a car with a shitty fuel economy to begin with, especially with two cars that nobody gives a flying fuck about.
Can you smell the desperation in the air?
Rosalina: But you didn't.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.