I was there on that fateful day, were you?
Your place for discussion about RPGs, gaming, music, movies, anime, computers, sports, and any other stuff we care to talk about...
UK groups trying to get Madworld banned
- Because playing them is not enough, we have to bitch about them daily, too. We had a Gameplay forum, but it got replaced by GameFAQs.
I don't even know how the argument of whether or not to allow ultra-violence in the UK media has any relation to casual gaming. I mean, this isn't anything new, the UK has banned stuff in that category for decades.
-Insert Inspiring Quote-
You obviously missed the sarcasm pointed at certain Wii-hating members of this forum who constantly call it a "casual only" machineDutch wrote:I don't even know how the argument of whether or not to allow ultra-violence in the UK media has any relation to casual gaming. I mean, this isn't anything new, the UK has banned stuff in that category for decades.
I was there on that fateful day, were you?
I don't understand what relevance "casual gaming" has in terms of that news though, sarcastic or not. While the object of discussion is a game, the topic is violent media. The fact that it is a Wii game isn't relevant since it would be banned on any system, or if it was a movie rather than a game. This has to do with media standards in the UK.
Last edited by Julius Seeker on Wed Aug 13, 2008 2:01 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-Insert Inspiring Quote-
Well, that's because you didn't understand the topic of the article. Extreme violence has no relevance to whether a game is casual or not. By your statement it looks like you think violence = hardcore.Zeus wrote:I'm not even gonna bother explaining it
Last edited by Julius Seeker on Wed Aug 13, 2008 2:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-Insert Inspiring Quote-
Even when you compliment his shitty system he argues with you.Zeus wrote:I'm not even gonna bother explaining it
Wii gets am exclusive violent game, pretty cool news, but i still have to stand up, directly in front of the TV, and wave my arms around like a tool.
Talk about completely over your head. This isn't about compliments, it is about a post making no logical sense.Flip wrote:Even when you compliment his shitty system he argues with you.Zeus wrote:I'm not even gonna bother explaining it
Wii gets am exclusive violent game, pretty cool news, but i still have to stand up, directly in front of the TV, and wave my arms around like a tool.
The Wii isn't a "shitty system" if you're not an angry person whose wife left him for his roommate. Also, I don't think anyone thinks you're supposed to wave your arms around like a tool except children and retarded people; oh, and you.
-Insert Inspiring Quote-
Thats half the problem, which i mentioned a while ago. The Wii WANTS you to do full motion (like a full motion bowling approach) yet there are ways to be better by cheating (i.e. using just your wrist and fingers). Make up your mind Wii, be a gimmick and do it right or stop attempting!Dutch wrote:Talk about completely over your head. This isn't about compliments, it is about a post making no logical sense.Flip wrote:Even when you compliment his shitty system he argues with you.Zeus wrote:I'm not even gonna bother explaining it
Wii gets am exclusive violent game, pretty cool news, but i still have to stand up, directly in front of the TV, and wave my arms around like a tool.
The Wii isn't a "shitty system" if you're not an angry person whose wife left him for his roommate. Also, I don't think anyone thinks you're supposed to wave your arms around like a tool except children and retarded people; oh, and you.
Lol, and for the record, she only slept with him AFTER we separated and i only lived with him AFTER we separated, too. Sucked that i lived there for a whole year and didnt know, though, wont lie about that!
Woah...I think we're maybe getting into the "below the belt" territory.Flip wrote:Thats half the problem, which i mentioned a while ago. The Wii WANTS you to do full motion (like a full motion bowling approach) yet there are ways to be better by cheating (i.e. using just your wrist and fingers). Make up your mind Wii, be a gimmick and do it right or stop attempting!Dutch wrote:Talk about completely over your head. This isn't about compliments, it is about a post making no logical sense.Flip wrote: Even when you compliment his shitty system he argues with you.
Wii gets am exclusive violent game, pretty cool news, but i still have to stand up, directly in front of the TV, and wave my arms around like a tool.
The Wii isn't a "shitty system" if you're not an angry person whose wife left him for his roommate. Also, I don't think anyone thinks you're supposed to wave your arms around like a tool except children and retarded people; oh, and you.
Lol, and for the record, she only slept with him AFTER we separated and i only lived with him AFTER we separated, too. Sucked that i lived there for a whole year and didnt know, though, wont lie about that!
Anyway, is this really news? The UK tries to ban just about everything if it has even a drop of blood in it. Sure, they have softcore porn on network TV there, but god forbid Cartoon violence. This isn't really worth a debate.
Oh...it's gonna get ugly in here, lol.
Anyway, I kinda agree with Seeker -- and I missed the sarcasm in zeus' original post because it made no sense.
I don't see how violence has anything to do with casual/hardcore (hey fucker, use core/non-core please). It does help dismiss the kiddy image though...about as much as Manhunt did (not much).
I doubt Nintendo would want to lose that image though, especially with their new "wide appeal" approach. Though I imagine if they really wanted to lose it, it would take them actually releasing 1st party mature games...not simply allowing 3rd party offerings (I don't think Nintendo actively blocks 3rd party mature games...I think it's just devs that believe it's a limited market on Nintendo systems and avoid releasing there...correct me if I'm wrong).
PS - I slept with my roomates girlfriend...hell, I screwed her in the same (hotel) bed while he was passed out drunk after a Depeche Mode concert. NEVER trust a fucking roomate.
Anyway, I kinda agree with Seeker -- and I missed the sarcasm in zeus' original post because it made no sense.
I don't see how violence has anything to do with casual/hardcore (hey fucker, use core/non-core please). It does help dismiss the kiddy image though...about as much as Manhunt did (not much).
I doubt Nintendo would want to lose that image though, especially with their new "wide appeal" approach. Though I imagine if they really wanted to lose it, it would take them actually releasing 1st party mature games...not simply allowing 3rd party offerings (I don't think Nintendo actively blocks 3rd party mature games...I think it's just devs that believe it's a limited market on Nintendo systems and avoid releasing there...correct me if I'm wrong).
PS - I slept with my roomates girlfriend...hell, I screwed her in the same (hotel) bed while he was passed out drunk after a Depeche Mode concert. NEVER trust a fucking roomate.
Ok, i'll try and help zeus out, because when i read the article it sounded like this... even though it is not the exact definition of the terms we tried to find:
“The objective is to kill opponents as creatively as possible to earn more points, which can be used to purchase new weapons and mini-games,” Sega of America product marketing manager Mitsue Nakagaki told us last month.
Whoa, that sounds pretty core.
Now certain sections of the mainstream British press have picked up on the game’s existence and gone on the attack, claiming MadWorld will ruin the Wii’s ‘innocent’ image.
I read innocent, i read non-core
"I believe it will spoil the family fun image of the Wii.”
The non-core image of the Wii.
adding that the Wii “appeals to a wide range of audiences”
Non-core.
the title ‘looks set to wreck the popular console’s family-friendly image’.
What is the Wii's image? Non-core.
Maybe violence doesnt exactly mean core, but its an element of it.
And for the record, again, the ex-wife isnt with or dating the ex-friend, she just fucked him to piss me off or make herself feel better or whatever insane motives. It doesnt get me that angry anymore, luckily, because when does an attack on the Wii warrant a personal issue attack? Yikes, Seeker sleeps with his Wii, i suppose. Bangs the little controller port with his teeny wee-wee (Wii-Wii). Its all starting to make sense.
“The objective is to kill opponents as creatively as possible to earn more points, which can be used to purchase new weapons and mini-games,” Sega of America product marketing manager Mitsue Nakagaki told us last month.
Whoa, that sounds pretty core.
Now certain sections of the mainstream British press have picked up on the game’s existence and gone on the attack, claiming MadWorld will ruin the Wii’s ‘innocent’ image.
I read innocent, i read non-core
"I believe it will spoil the family fun image of the Wii.”
The non-core image of the Wii.
adding that the Wii “appeals to a wide range of audiences”
Non-core.
the title ‘looks set to wreck the popular console’s family-friendly image’.
What is the Wii's image? Non-core.
Maybe violence doesnt exactly mean core, but its an element of it.
And for the record, again, the ex-wife isnt with or dating the ex-friend, she just fucked him to piss me off or make herself feel better or whatever insane motives. It doesnt get me that angry anymore, luckily, because when does an attack on the Wii warrant a personal issue attack? Yikes, Seeker sleeps with his Wii, i suppose. Bangs the little controller port with his teeny wee-wee (Wii-Wii). Its all starting to make sense.
Well, I'm not sure you are helping him in that case...let's pretend your interpretation (of both the article and the terms) is correct...Flip wrote:Ok, i'll try and help zeus out, because when i read the article it sounded like this... even though it is not the exact definition of the terms we tried to find:
The Wii has a definative "non-core" (family-friendly/casual) image, evidenced by the fact that a single vague "core" (violent/hardcore) game is causing outrage in a segment of the market.
His supposed sarcasm is pretty stupid in light of your explaination because according to the article, the Wii HAS a casual reputation and zeus is trying to claim a single unknown "violent" game all of a sudden reverses that image....Zeus wrote:You obviously missed the sarcasm pointed at certain Wii-hating members of this forum who constantly call it a "casual only" machine
Pretty stupid no matter which way you slice it.
Oh, and you wont. The day i see Seek type, 'i was wrong' or 'i'm sorry' will the day hell freezes over. Maybe back in the day a med-school dropout turned bartender could rile me up, but these last two years makes all of that simply laughable.Eric wrote:I'm still in awe Seeker went there and hasn't backpedaled yet.
What the FUCK, Seeker?! Jesus Fucking Christ! You should seriously apologize to Flip for being such a fucking dick!Dutch wrote:The Wii isn't a "shitty system" if you're not an angry person whose wife left him for his roommate. Also, I don't think anyone thinks you're supposed to wave your arms around like a tool except children and retarded people; oh, and you.
Rosalina: But you didn't.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.
.... I was going to comment on this, but now that I've read the entire thread... I'm just going to back out slowly and forget I saw this.
And I thought there wasn't anything Seek could say that would shock and offend me anymore, fuck man even Mental wasn't that much a dick in his hay-day.
And I thought there wasn't anything Seek could say that would shock and offend me anymore, fuck man even Mental wasn't that much a dick in his hay-day.
He came into this thread with a disrespectful tone on a topic about violence in the UK media and complained in a disrespectful manner that I argued against people who complimented a system which I like (which is 100% irrelevant to the conversaton). I simply responded showing no respect in return. It was both justified and fun =) If he wants to take offense, that's his business; not something I particularly care about.SineSwiper wrote:What the FUCK, Seeker?! Jesus Fucking Christ! You should seriously apologize to Flip for being such a fucking dick!Dutch wrote:The Wii isn't a "shitty system" if you're not an angry person whose wife left him for his roommate. Also, I don't think anyone thinks you're supposed to wave your arms around like a tool except children and retarded people; oh, and you.
For the record, Mental wasn't that bad at all; I am fairly sure myself, Kali, and others here were worse to him than he was to others. All he did was make harmless threats of death and legal action.
If I wasn't supposed to hate you I would give you a high five =Pkali o. wrote:PS - I slept with my roomates girlfriend...hell, I screwed her in the same (hotel) bed while he was passed out drunk after a Depeche Mode concert.
-Insert Inspiring Quote-
Proportional fucking RESPONSE though--you guys are arguing about VIDEO GAMES and you take a cheap shot at his failed MARRIAGE? Isn't that a little off? I mean, you guys are all supposed to be friends--there's no excuse for hitting below the belt like that. If you're gonna insult someone, you need to do it in proportion!Dutch wrote:He came into this thread with a disrespectful tone on a topic about violence in the UK media and complained in a disrespectful manner that I argued against people who complimented a system which I like (which is 100% irrelevant to the conversaton). I simply responded showing no respect in return. It was both justified and fun =) If he wants to take offense, that's his business; not something I particularly care about.SineSwiper wrote:What the FUCK, Seeker?! Jesus Fucking Christ! You should seriously apologize to Flip for being such a fucking dick!Dutch wrote:The Wii isn't a "shitty system" if you're not an angry person whose wife left him for his roommate. Also, I don't think anyone thinks you're supposed to wave your arms around like a tool except children and retarded people; oh, and you.
It's like, you are Russia, and he is Georgia, and you have gone TOO FAR.
A research idea: figure out a way to determine what percentage of a post is addressing the topic at hand by introducing new ideas and supporting old ones, and what percentage of a post is occupied with insulting the other person and their position. The amount of crap in the post is the crap ration: 1 means completely useful, 0 means completely crap. This number is kept for each poster in each thread. Each post to a thread changes your crap ratio for that thread depending on what you post. Once your ratio for a thread drops below a threshold, you're locked from that thread only. (Which I don't think phpbb supports, but that's trivial to do compared to getting the crap ratio.)
Getting the crap ratio: really, really hard. Natural language processing is something I know nothing about. But, considering how good spam filters are, I think we could get away with not actually understanding the text and using Bayesian filters. Training the filter would be the tough part, I think.
Anyway, this is a roundabout way of saying I look at these threads, consider locking it, then decide it's that's more trouble than it's worth, and at least it keeps the crap contained in a single thread.
Also: I've had a bigass cup of coffee and this is how I'm putting off editing our conference paper due Monday.
Getting the crap ratio: really, really hard. Natural language processing is something I know nothing about. But, considering how good spam filters are, I think we could get away with not actually understanding the text and using Bayesian filters. Training the filter would be the tough part, I think.
Anyway, this is a roundabout way of saying I look at these threads, consider locking it, then decide it's that's more trouble than it's worth, and at least it keeps the crap contained in a single thread.
Also: I've had a bigass cup of coffee and this is how I'm putting off editing our conference paper due Monday.
Disrespect is disrespect.RentCavalier wrote:Proportional fucking RESPONSE though--you guys are arguing about VIDEO GAMES and you take a cheap shot at his failed MARRIAGE? Isn't that a little off? I mean, you guys are all supposed to be friends--there's no excuse for hitting below the belt like that. If you're gonna insult someone, you need to do it in proportion!Dutch wrote:He came into this thread with a disrespectful tone on a topic about violence in the UK media and complained in a disrespectful manner that I argued against people who complimented a system which I like (which is 100% irrelevant to the conversaton). I simply responded showing no respect in return. It was both justified and fun =) If he wants to take offense, that's his business; not something I particularly care about.SineSwiper wrote: What the FUCK, Seeker?! Jesus Fucking Christ! You should seriously apologize to Flip for being such a fucking dick!
It's like, you are Russia, and he is Georgia, and you have gone TOO FAR.
-Insert Inspiring Quote-
Keep that statement in mind while considering you're the one throwing the insults. All I've done is point out factual information about you.Flip wrote:Insults from a known douchebag dont do much damage.
-Insert Inspiring Quote-
it's still significantly more tasteless than the meaningless insults usually thrown around here. Flip openly told us about a phase in his life that was certainly not something that I would share around here (due possibly to me being a big wuss). To turn that around on him later is really something entirely different than calling you names due to your opinion on a console or the games available for it.Dutch wrote:All I've done is point out factual information about you.
So you guys disagree on something, big whoop. Isn't there some sort of saying about bigger people and walking away or something like that?
You are a med school dropout turned bartender = factDutch wrote:Keep that statement in mind while considering you're the one throwing the insults. All I've done is point out factual information about you.Flip wrote:Insults from a known douchebag dont do much damage.
Im pretty sure the teeny wii-wii comment is also fact and if public opinion makes something true, then your def a douche. Dont hate on me, its just what everyone thinks. *shrug*
Before this could possibly get even more childish, though, its probably best you hang your head and slink away.
Meh - locking is lame.
They are all adults - if they want to take it to the ditch level, let em. Besides, sometimes a good arguement is as carthartic as a good cry.
I won't unlock...but you should. The rest of you pansies can just avoid it if ya don't like it
They are all adults - if they want to take it to the ditch level, let em. Besides, sometimes a good arguement is as carthartic as a good cry.
I won't unlock...but you should. The rest of you pansies can just avoid it if ya don't like it
Woo! I can still post!
Rosalina: But you didn't.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.