Being married to a programmer is like having a cat. You talk to it but you're never really sure if it hears you, much less comprehends what you say.
Your place for discussion about RPGs, gaming, music, movies, anime, computers, sports, and any other stuff we care to talk about...
Man appears free of HIV after stem cell transplant
- Somehow, we still tolerate each other. Eventually this will be the only forum left.
I am not really sure on the religious viewpoint. On the biological side of things many consider it unethical to use embryos to obtain stem cells. The situation of a willing donor is completely ethical biologically; on the religious side, I am not sure. It is possible that there are still people against everything that could possibly disprove something in their faith.Zeus wrote:But God doesn't like stem-cell research. Can't possibly be a solution to pursue for future viability
-Insert Inspiring Quote-
Question them:Anarky wrote:People extending their life spans by any means is questionable.
-Insert Inspiring Quote-
Come on, guys. If you're going to speak to religious views, at least know what you're talking about. I know it's difficult. Yes, I'm sure there are some people who are religious and are against all kinds of stem cell research. However, the majority are only against embryonic stem cell research. And they are only against it because of the method of recovering the stem cells (it usually results in the descruction of the prenatal).
The article said that the surgery used a "stem cell transplant from a donor carrying a gene mutation" so I doubt most religious people will have an issue with it.
And, yes, this is very cool.
The article said that the surgery used a "stem cell transplant from a donor carrying a gene mutation" so I doubt most religious people will have an issue with it.
And, yes, this is very cool.
You know, if that mom killed off some of those embryos, we wouldn't be up in arms about that bitch with 14 kids. Fucking irresponsible! New rule: If you want to have in vitro implantation, you have to be pro-choice!
Rosalina: But you didn't.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.
New rule: to be implanted for a child you need to first prove you can properly provide for it (ie. at least have the funds to do it and not need to set up a website to ask for donations).SineSwiper wrote:You know, if that mom killed off some of those embryos, we wouldn't be up in arms about that bitch with 14 kids. Fucking irresponsible! New rule: If you want to have in vitro implantation, you have to be pro-choice!
I was there on that fateful day, were you?
No, but that at least opened some doors for further research/discussion. I mean, having at least some kind of remission is HUGE in terms of battling this disease. It is a major step forward considering they've had zero up to this pointKupek wrote:Maybe not! That's the nature of research. A 10% solution won't necessarily extend to a 100% solution.Seraphina wrote:But its a huge step towards a better option.
I was there on that fateful day, were you?
True. It only removed traces in certain areas. They still think it's hiding out somewhere else.Kupek wrote:No, it's not a cure, but I still consider it progress.
Progress yes and maybe gives some hope to the future. Still the best news I've heard in terms of the path to a cure
I was there on that fateful day, were you?