SineSwiper wrote:RentCavalier wrote:I would prefer it if they were a publically traded company though. I share the auditor's concern.
If they were a publicly traded company, nobody would care about anything except "Duhhhhh...numbers go UP...duhhh...numbers go down....duhhhhhhh!" Doesn't matter if they are killing puppies and feeding their remains to the public. If they are making money doing that, the public will still buy their stock until the numbers go down.
Why do you think our capitalistic empire is so fucked up?
I sort of agree with Sine but with about half the disdain for public stockholders (mind you, that still means I think they're morons :-).
If they were to become a public company, the pressures to meet forecasts, announce actual release dates and stick to them, and the financial scrutiny that comes with each and every release would severely stun creativity and destroy the culture that makes their games of the quality they are IMO. In a few years, there would be huge changes in personnel and culture and they just wouldn't be the same company anymore.
The ONLY way this works is if they're a private company that makes audited financials available to all registered investors. They would risk the info coming out for sure, but they will have to provide them - or at least specified audited financial information for that particular project - to make it work