Sometimes I feel reading stuff online is like watching the de-evolution of humanity. I mean I have no illusion about the Net being a place of spiritual enlightenment, but sometimes I think you can find more stimulating conversation in an elementary school than online. Here are two I ran across today that gives me less faith about humanity since they exist.
1. The stupid picture with captions. I think the most common one you see is the special olympics one about how winning on Internet is like winning in the special olympics and shows some mentally retarded person jumping over a hurdle. 99% of such pictures are stupid and don't really pretain to the subject at hand, but people like to use them probably because they really want to use the picture. It's sort of like people who try to purposely invoke Godwin's law to end a debate without realizing that Godwin's law says you cannot purposely invoke Godwin's law to try to end a debate, but at least Godwin's Law is sort of well known compared to some random photoshopped picture with words.
The implication here seems to be like: I have a cool picture -> I better use it -> I win.
2. The 'fixed for you', for example
Don: The world is round
Don said:
The world is FLAT
Someguy: Fixed it for you.
I'd equate this to being in elementary school when you say something and someone disagree citing "Because" as a reason, but at least here the guy saying the "Because" showed a willingness to commit to a stance even if he cannot give any valid reasons to do so.
I have noticed this tends to happen more often in a psuedo-intellectual community. You'll rarely see behaviors like this in say, a system war thread. It'd most likely just be something like "NINTENDO SUXS AND YOUR DUMB" and again, that'd at least indicate a willing to take a stand instead of completely avoiding the issue altogether. I often see people say people online act like children, and I think that's unfair to children. I certainly don't recall any children that are as dumb as some of the people I see online.
1. The stupid picture with captions. I think the most common one you see is the special olympics one about how winning on Internet is like winning in the special olympics and shows some mentally retarded person jumping over a hurdle. 99% of such pictures are stupid and don't really pretain to the subject at hand, but people like to use them probably because they really want to use the picture. It's sort of like people who try to purposely invoke Godwin's law to end a debate without realizing that Godwin's law says you cannot purposely invoke Godwin's law to try to end a debate, but at least Godwin's Law is sort of well known compared to some random photoshopped picture with words.
The implication here seems to be like: I have a cool picture -> I better use it -> I win.
2. The 'fixed for you', for example
Don: The world is round
Don said:
The world is FLAT
Someguy: Fixed it for you.
I'd equate this to being in elementary school when you say something and someone disagree citing "Because" as a reason, but at least here the guy saying the "Because" showed a willingness to commit to a stance even if he cannot give any valid reasons to do so.
I have noticed this tends to happen more often in a psuedo-intellectual community. You'll rarely see behaviors like this in say, a system war thread. It'd most likely just be something like "NINTENDO SUXS AND YOUR DUMB" and again, that'd at least indicate a willing to take a stand instead of completely avoiding the issue altogether. I often see people say people online act like children, and I think that's unfair to children. I certainly don't recall any children that are as dumb as some of the people I see online.
Last edited by Don on Fri Aug 07, 2009 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.