I was there on that fateful day, were you?
Your place for discussion about RPGs, gaming, music, movies, anime, computers, sports, and any other stuff we care to talk about...
Last Remnant review
- Because playing them is not enough, we have to bitch about them daily, too. We had a Gameplay forum, but it got replaced by GameFAQs.
I had my bud in the industry tell me that Famitsu often reviews based on what its readers anticipate so as to not "insult" the readers. Makes sense considering some of their inconsistenciesRentCavalier wrote:Well shit. So much for Famitsu.
I was there on that fateful day, were you?
Fuck them. They rig their own ratings, and are not a reliable source of reviews at all.RentCavalier wrote:Well shit. So much for Famitsu.
That's a friendly way of saying that they take corporate money and elevate their scores based on bribes.Zeus wrote:I had my bud in the industry tell me that Famitsu often reviews based on what its readers anticipate so as to not "insult" the readers. Makes sense considering some of their inconsistencies
Rosalina: But you didn't.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.
Whatever. Square donates plenty of money to them for advertising. If they give them bad ratings, they might lose dollars. And yes, if they give a popular game bad ratings, they might lose customers (and thus, dollars).
In any case, it doesn't matter as it's just the same thing: sacrificing quality-of-work for the bottom line.
In any case, it doesn't matter as it's just the same thing: sacrificing quality-of-work for the bottom line.
Rosalina: But you didn't.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.
Of course, the Japanese always celebrate style over substance. Doesn't make it right.
Rosalina: But you didn't.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.
