One of the things that always puzzled me is that when talking about advertising, it seems like most people believe advertising is some kind of magic where if you put in X dollars in advertising, it always returns at least X+1 dollars in revenue. I usually see this in the context of gaming, but obviously this isn't just limited to gaming. Of course by that logic someone should buy up all the ads on Superbowl since if buying one ads is a good idea, buying all of them is obviously even better!
Is the concept of diminishing returns really that hard to understand for the average guy? Don't people realize that advertising campaigns can fail? I know a bunch of dot coms during the bubble bought Superbowl ads and that sure didn't help them very much. Granted since you cannot make people answer a survey like 'did you buy this burger because you saw this ad' so there's always going to be uncertainty so people can guess wrong, but there still has to be a point where you can clearly tell if the advertising succeeded or failed.
Is the concept of diminishing returns really that hard to understand for the average guy? Don't people realize that advertising campaigns can fail? I know a bunch of dot coms during the bubble bought Superbowl ads and that sure didn't help them very much. Granted since you cannot make people answer a survey like 'did you buy this burger because you saw this ad' so there's always going to be uncertainty so people can guess wrong, but there still has to be a point where you can clearly tell if the advertising succeeded or failed.