Seen on the Newsweek boards today

[Mental]

To anyone who cares about the future of European Americans and their culture, this development is tragic and sad. It may not be "politically correct" to say it, but yes - I DO believe that it's important for European Americans to maintain their racial identity as much as they possibly can. The large cities on the coasts are now almost all "majority minority" and although many on this board may disagree, I think this demographic transformation of these cities is a tragic loss for European Americans and their culture.

The "heartland" of America has always been the anchor of the nation, providing America with most of its food, much of its industry and many of its good people. Even though I live on the East Coast, I have a special fondness for the people of the "flyover states" and I would like to see those people and that culture survive.

This article suggests that Midwestern states should " work on attracting immigrant populations, who can help revive dying towns through their sheer numbers." I strongly disagree. The still majority-white Midwest should work on MAINTAINING a white majority and preserving the European American character of it's small towns. The small town culture of rural white America is an invaluable cultural and historical treasure that can never be replaced once lost. In the future, perhaps whites who are tired of government enforced multiculturalism and the high crime rate of the inner cities will rediscover the Midwest and treat it as a protected refuge for their people. Perhaps THAT will be the "selling point" that will revive the Midwest economy.

Racial identity and survival are a natural part of being human. The Japanese have a nation to themselves and no one thinks ill of them. The Mexicans have a nation in Mexico, Jews have a nation in Israel, the Chinese have a nation in China - and even the Dali Lama, certainly a man of peace, seeks a nation for his own people and their culture.

White people too need a nation and there is absolutely NOTHING wrong with saying so. Let's start by maintaining a white majority in the American Midwest.

[Julius Seeker]

Mexico a country for Mexicans =P

Mexican isn't really a nationality unless you consider the Aztec descendants to be the true blooded Mexicans.... BUT, 10% of the population is white, are they not Mexicans? How about the Mayan population? or the 30% of mixed European people?

[Shrinweck]

The Japanese have a nation to themselves largely because there's no room for anyone else.

Also: What people need a nation of their own? Wow. Uh.... You know what? Not really going to say anything.

There's also the fact that the USA would better be described as a nation of immigrants...

Edit: Wait... this is a forum post? Okay, fuck why do I care haha.

[Mental]

White people too need a nation and there is absolutely NOTHING wrong with saying so.

WHITE PEOPLE HAVE A WHOLE CONTINENT!!!!! IT'S CALLED EUROPE!!!!!! AAAAAGGGGHHHH I HATE PEOPLE FOREVER

I mean, aside from the notion that somehow keeping a white majority in the Midwest constitutes a "white nation". What was this dude gonna do, get Grand Rapids, Michigan to secede from the Union?

I crossposted this here just to show the kind of goonery that's been coming out of the woodwork since Obama got elected. It's been like this forever on the Newsweek boards, now.

[Tessian]

Translation: "I CAN'T HANDLE CHANGE WAHHH WHY CAN'T THINGS STAY THE SAME AND JUST WITHER AND DIE LIKE GOD INTENDED??"

I do love the "Mexicans have Mexico" but EUROPEAN Americans don't have a place?

Could we teleport this guy back 300 years as a native american?

[Julius Seeker]

Fair & Lovely

[Kupek]

Edit: Wait... this is a forum post? Okay, fuck why do I care haha.

[SineSwiper]

You know my stance on the matter: fuck everybody until we're all one color.