Conn. decrims Pot

Reply

#152775 by Imakeholesinu
Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:05 pm

http://gothamist.com/2011/06/08/connect ... iminal.php

Progressive step forward or criminal step backwards?

"An old man dies, a young girl lives, fair trade." - Bruce Willis from Sin City.

[url=http://profile.xfire.com/imakeholesinu][img]http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/bg/type/0/imakeholesinu.png[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.myspace.com/atmosphere][img]http://rhymesayers.com/promo/banners/youcant-banner.gif[/img][/url]

Username

Imakeholesinu

Rank

Demesnite

Posts

4203

Joined

Sun Nov 01, 1998 12:00 am

Location

Dogtown

Contact

Re: Conn. decrims Pot

#152784 by Julius Seeker
Wed Jun 08, 2011 9:15 pm

We had it decriminalized here years ago, very little has changed. You still get fined for getting caught with pot, just no criminal charges.

-Insert Inspiring Quote-

Username

Julius Seeker

Rank

Posting God

Posts

14067

Joined

Sun Jun 01, 1997 12:00 pm

Location

Canada

Contact

Re: Conn. decrims Pot

#154544 by SineSwiper
Thu Oct 13, 2011 8:47 pm

Doesn't matter. The feds are already warning California pot shops that they have 30 days to pack their shit and leave. So much for leaving the issue alone for a while. Yay to arresting AIDS patients!

Rosalina: But you didn't.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.

Username

SineSwiper

Rank

Superuser

Posts

17202

Joined

Sun Jul 13, 1997 10:00 am

Contact

Reply

Page 1 of 1
3 posts