http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com ... ntarctica/
The article clearly blames this on global warming and that's bad. Let's say an all powerful entity arrived and told us that the current global warming is completely natural, does this mean it is now totally okay for habitat to get wiped out in Antarctica because we are not involved? I'm assuming nobody bio-engineered these crabs to be awesome habitat destroyers and we didn't purposely set them loose to try to increase the number of crabs we can catch. Did God said that the habitat in Antarctica is sacred and thus made the water too cold for the crabs to swim through? Actually that'd at least make some sense if you're to blame this on human. These crabs always could've wiped out their neighboring environment and it just happened that the water was too cold for them to swim through. Whether the cause is manmade or not, they'd still wipe out their neighbors when they can swim through the water.
It seems to me a lot of these articles basically assume that extinction or anything that comes close to it has to be bad. If temperature is warmer than now, some stuff might go extinct that wouldn't have otherwise. But I'm sure there are also stuff that'd go extinct (or already extinct) because the temperature is what it is now compared to something else. If we're in the Ice Age, then the wholly mammoth and sabertooth tiger wouldn't be extinct, but life would pretty much suck for just about everyone else.
The article clearly blames this on global warming and that's bad. Let's say an all powerful entity arrived and told us that the current global warming is completely natural, does this mean it is now totally okay for habitat to get wiped out in Antarctica because we are not involved? I'm assuming nobody bio-engineered these crabs to be awesome habitat destroyers and we didn't purposely set them loose to try to increase the number of crabs we can catch. Did God said that the habitat in Antarctica is sacred and thus made the water too cold for the crabs to swim through? Actually that'd at least make some sense if you're to blame this on human. These crabs always could've wiped out their neighboring environment and it just happened that the water was too cold for them to swim through. Whether the cause is manmade or not, they'd still wipe out their neighbors when they can swim through the water.
It seems to me a lot of these articles basically assume that extinction or anything that comes close to it has to be bad. If temperature is warmer than now, some stuff might go extinct that wouldn't have otherwise. But I'm sure there are also stuff that'd go extinct (or already extinct) because the temperature is what it is now compared to something else. If we're in the Ice Age, then the wholly mammoth and sabertooth tiger wouldn't be extinct, but life would pretty much suck for just about everyone else.