<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>In short:
Well, Tony Bliar's statement was essentially "It was not a lie, we were led to believe that there were in fact weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Tony Bliar supporter: "Indeed it was not just the fault of the Prime Minister, but rather the belief of many."
Opposition: "We don't deny that it was a group effort, but only on part of your government. You see, we already said that there was no reason to go to war, there was no proof of any weapons. You may not be lying, but you are admitting that your government is incompetent for not seeing the truth, even when it was constantly in front of you."
I don't know how this is going to translate over into the US, but essentially I think most of us here are quite under the impression that Bush was lying; otherwise the CIA, with all their complexes and funding, is worthless.</div>
Well, Tony Bliar's statement was essentially "It was not a lie, we were led to believe that there were in fact weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Tony Bliar supporter: "Indeed it was not just the fault of the Prime Minister, but rather the belief of many."
Opposition: "We don't deny that it was a group effort, but only on part of your government. You see, we already said that there was no reason to go to war, there was no proof of any weapons. You may not be lying, but you are admitting that your government is incompetent for not seeing the truth, even when it was constantly in front of you."
I don't know how this is going to translate over into the US, but essentially I think most of us here are quite under the impression that Bush was lying; otherwise the CIA, with all their complexes and funding, is worthless.</div>
-Insert Inspiring Quote-