Screw traditional dating methods...go for the Army chicks!

Reply

Screw traditional dating methods...go for the Army chicks!

#17854 by Agent 57
Thu Jul 22, 2004 9:32 am

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '><b>Link:</b> <a href="http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtm ... 5745073</a>

Screw traditional dating methods...go for the Army chicks!</div>

[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Twxabfn][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/gbar/360/Twxabfn.gif[/img][/url]

Username

Agent 57

Rank

Regular

Posts

1014

Joined

Wed Jul 01, 1998 12:00 pm

Location

Tewksbury, MA (Eastern time zone)

Contact

#17866 by SineSwiper
Fri Jul 23, 2004 12:11 am

<div style='font: 10pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light", "Century Gothic"; text-align: left; '>Jesus! I guess it's a good idea, but damn...</div>

Rosalina: But you didn't.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.

Username

SineSwiper

Rank

Superuser

Posts

17203

Joined

Sun Jul 13, 1997 10:00 am

Contact

Reply

Page 1 of 1
2 posts