<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>To the Palestinians, until very recently, he was a savior. From WW2 on, there's essentially been the genocide of the Palestinian people and their culture. If you were a Palestinian and didn't assimilate into the Israeli culture (which meant that you were a second-class citizen, restricted in what you could do, what you could have, and food and clothing rations for a long time; this is why my family moved here), you were nothing to them. You had to move to Jordan (where many of them went), Syria, Saudi Arabia (if you were Muslim), etc. And we're talking about people whose family had lived in those areas for millenia (my family, for instance, was one of the founding families of Nazareth, the only truly Arab city left in Israel). If you didn't, and tried to fight for the land your great, great, great, great, great grandfather (and then some) lived on, you were basically dead. If you do this for decades, you're going to build a considerable level of resentment (for obvious reasons), even to those who decided, for survival, to assimilate. Repression leads to radical thinking and radical actions.
In come the rebels, which Arafat was one of back in the day. Then fight for what they say is "Palestinian freedom" (let's not bother with the details on whether it is or not for now). Much like the Germans in 1936, you accept these radicals as saviors even though much later you look back and say "fuck, we were such uncivilized idiots". But at that time, you have nothing and these guys are giving you something (hope, mostly). This is why Arafat and his people were considered saviors by many.
So, from the Palestinian (and some other Arab perspectives), he was a savior, not a terrorist, like the Americans and Israelis saw him. Why was he a terrorist? Because he a) went against the authority of the Israeli people and b) used extreme force to get what he wanted. Well, look at Bush and Sharon (BTW, Sharon is essentally a warlord and a war criminal; take a look at his history and you'll see that he was a part of the murders of numerous Palestinians for decades, much more than any of the so-called 'radicals' in and around that area) and apply the same criteria from a different perspective (say, the Afgan or Iraqi or Palestinian people) and you can make just as strong case (if not much stronger) that they are the true terrorists. There's a reason the UN doesn't back them (at the end of the day, the UN by its nature is the conglomeration of many, many different points of view) and a reason why the Americans are so hated on a worldwide scale (basically, they hate you, but they know they need you). And it's not just your relationship with Israel.
So, when people here or down there say "good riddance" or "thank god that terrorist is dead", all I'm saying is, try to think about what you're saying. Try looking at it from the perspective of the other side - play devil's advocate - and maybe you can develop a more well-rounded opinion and not appear as an uneducated bigot (whether you are or not, you can appear to be one when you have such strong feelings about something you know very little about; trust me, the Arabs are among the worst at this). You didn't see me come out and say "the world has lost a great, great man", and I'm Palestinian.</div>
I was there on that fateful day, were you?