Tom DeLay is a perfect example of the corruption of the Republican party... He might be getting indicted on felony charges so what do the Republicans do? They try to change the party rules to allow convicted felons to hold office... This *after* the

Tom DeLay is a perfect example of the corruption of the Republican party... He might be getting indicted on felony charges so what do the Republicans do? They try to change the party rules to allow convicted felons to hold office... This *after* the
Somehow, we still tolerate each other. Eventually this will be the only forum left.

Tom DeLay is a perfect example of the corruption of the Republican party... He might be getting indicted on felony charges so what do the Republicans do? They try to change the party rules to allow convicted felons to hold office... This after the

2 posts

2 posts

Tom DeLay is a perfect example of the corruption of the Republican party... He might be getting indicted on felony charges so what do the Republicans do? They try to change the party rules to allow convicted felons to hold office... This after the

#20023 by ManaMan
Sat Nov 20, 2004 10:42 am

<div style='font: 12pt Arial; text-align: left; '><b>Link:</b> <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c ... 931.DTL</a>

Tom DeLay is a perfect example of the corruption of the Republican party... He might be getting indicted on felony charges so what do the Republicans do? They try to change the party rules to allow convicted felons to hold office... This *after* the Texas redistricting...</div>

Username

ManaMan

Rank

Prime Regular

Posts

2466

Joined

Sat Feb 03, 2001 3:10 pm

Location

Madison, WI

Actually, the rule is that a person under indictment can't hold office, and the Repub's only made the rule to show their "moral superiority" to Dems who continued to hold leadership offices while under indictment.

#20025 by Gentz
Sat Nov 20, 2004 11:34 am

<div style='font: 11pt arial; text-align: left; '>Are party rules really that big a deal anyway? They seem more like a self-adopted set of guidelines than anything. All this really is is some minor hypocrisy on the part of the Repub's.</div>

[b]Sorry, it looks like I'm going to have to kill you in an instant.[/b]

Username

Gentz

Rank

Elite Regular

Posts

3414

Joined

Mon Feb 05, 2001 1:00 am

Location

Pittsburgh, PA

Page 1 of 1
2 posts

Return to “Daily Stuph”

Display:

Sort by:

Jump to:

- All times are UTC-05:00 -

Tom DeLay is a perfect example of the corruption of the Republican party... He might be getting indicted on felony charges so what do the Republicans do? They try to change the party rules to allow convicted felons to hold office... This *after* the

Tom DeLay is a perfect example of the corruption of the Republican party... He might be getting indicted on felony charges so what do the Republicans do? They try to change the party rules to allow convicted felons to hold office... This *after* the

Tom DeLay is a perfect example of the corruption of the Republican party... He might be getting indicted on felony charges so what do the Republicans do? They try to change the party rules to allow convicted felons to hold office... This *after* the

Actually, the rule is that a person under *indictment* can't hold office, and the Repub's only made the rule to show their "moral superiority" to Dems who continued to hold leadership offices while under indictment.

Tom DeLay is a perfect example of the corruption of the Republican party... He might be getting indicted on felony charges so what do the Republicans do? They try to change the party rules to allow convicted felons to hold office... This after the

Tom DeLay is a perfect example of the corruption of the Republican party... He might be getting indicted on felony charges so what do the Republicans do? They try to change the party rules to allow convicted felons to hold office... This after the

Tom DeLay is a perfect example of the corruption of the Republican party... He might be getting indicted on felony charges so what do the Republicans do? They try to change the party rules to allow convicted felons to hold office... This after the

Actually, the rule is that a person under indictment can't hold office, and the Repub's only made the rule to show their "moral superiority" to Dems who continued to hold leadership offices while under indictment.