Alright, I saw Austin Powers, and I don't really know what a few of you are thinking, but this one is definetly the funniest of the three.

[Julius Seeker]

<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>Alright, I saw Austin Powers, and I don't really know what a few of you are thinking, but this one is definetly the funniest of the three.</div>

[Zeus]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>I saw it again last night....it's EASILY the worst</div>

[G-man Joe]

<div style='font: 11pt "Fine Hand"; text-align: left; '>You got some balls, at least. I mean....your rep here is like a porn actress in a convent school. =8^P</div>

[Derithian]

<div style='font: italic bold 14pt ; text-align: center; '>exept I tendto agree with him on a few things....this being one of them....it was funny but the other 2 were better and the first was the best</div>

[Zeus]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>And we all know that the women going to the convent school just wish they could be the porn actress :-)</div>

[Julius Seeker]

<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>No, it's definetly funnier than the other two. I don't think there's even much of a question about it. You're not one of those anti-sequel people who think T1 is better than T2 are you?</div>

[kali o.]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Arnold was a better "bad guy"...

Again, I think Austin Powers 3 was nowhere near as good as the other two...didn't flow...tried too hard...and most of the people I know in RL agree.

However...there are a few that swear it is the BEST of the bunch.

Hit or miss, I guess...</div>

[G-man Joe]

<div style='font: 11pt "Fine Hand"; text-align: left; '>You're such a ho. =8^P</div>

[Julius Seeker]

<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>Well, at least that explains you =)</div>

[Zeus]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Personally, I think T2 was better, but not by much. The original still ruled, but the sequel is one of the best action flicks of all time...and it aged VERY well</div>

[kali o.]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Given your love of Titanic, and Seekers love of Kurt Russel pseudo-surfing in front of a bad blue screen...I can understand why you freaks can like T2 and it's cheesy touching moment between a boy and his robot at the end, more than T1...

Me...I didn't buy it...

I wish you both could self-terminate...

KO-</div>

[G-man Joe]

<div style='font: 11pt "Fine Hand"; text-align: left; '>"I wish you both could self-terminate..." BWAHAHAH!</div>

[Blotus]

<div style='font: 10pt "arial narrow"; text-align: left; padding: 0% 5% 0% 5%; '>Nope. T2 is still better.</div>

[Kupek]

<div style='font: 10pt verdana; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>T2 is far more entertaining.</div>

[kali o.]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>What was it about T2 you guys liked better...?

- Arnold as a good guy?
- John Connor's 1337 hacking skillz with an ATM?
- Little John's wholely believable 'junior rebel with a dirt bike' persona?
- Lame teaching-the-terminator-how-to-be-human ("Now I know why it is you cry..")?
- Sarah's stupid 'meeting the ghost of Kyle' scene?
- The terribly obvious token black guy?
- The Terminator smile (Ok, I laughed at this one)?
- Improved sfx and the T-1000 (this is about the only thing I can agree with)?

I'm not saying T2 is a bad movie (I mean, I bought the pricey DVD)...but I can't understand why you all think it's "better" than T1. The only guess I have are the better effects and the T-1000 character...very sweet. That guy [insert name] played his role well (granted, there was like no dialog, but still...).

Even that...I fail to see how it's a better movie? That's like saying Poltergeist 1 and Ghostbusters 1 are nowhere near as good as their better looking sequels...

KO-</div>

[Kupek]

<div style='font: 10pt verdana; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>It's more entertaining. Not a whole lot happens in the first one. Neither of the movies are deep and meaningful, but one has a lot more going on than the other.</div>

[Gentz]

<div style='font: 11pt arial; text-align: left; '>Why'd I like T2 more? Two words and one letter: Guns N' Roses</div>

[Gentz]

<div style='font: 11pt arial; text-align: left; '>Oh and let's not forget a certain Danny Cooksey, better known as Bobby Budnick, Ultimate Badass!</div>

[Ganath]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>More action, better sfx. Period.</div>

[Zeus]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>T2 was everything a sequel should be: bigger, better, and a great continuation of the original</div>

[Zeus]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>That's because the second one lived off the first one as opposed to being a continuation of it. Kinda like what happened from Austin Power 2 to Austin Powers 3. I mean, Austin 3 was bad, but it just didn't touch the first two. Then you get your great sequels, that take what the first one did and build on it. Empire Strikes Back and Aliens are excellent examples, off the top of my head. But so it T2. And it's not just me and Seek, a LOT of people think the second is better. T1 is still an awesome movie, but T2 is one of the best action movies of all time.

BTW, the T1000 was played by Robert Patrick, better known as Agent Doggett from X-Files</div>

[Julius Seeker]

<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>T1 is full of plot holes, and you gotta admit, is Arnolds Cheesiest movie. Acting is really bad in it too. T2 has a lot of subtle parody on the orriginal Terminator movie, if you pay attention there's a lot of comedy in it, it's not 100% serious like the other one. T2 is very entertaining.</div>

[Torgo]

<div style='font: 9pt Arial; text-align: left; '>Yes!</div>

[Slappy White]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Commando Is Arnolds "cheesiest movie" by lightyears. And if that's not it then Hercules in New York is.</div>

[Julius Seeker]

<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>Besides, Terminator is definetly cheesier, Commando is supposed to be funny, Terminator 1 was actually trying to be serious, but everyone laughs at it regardless.</div>

[Zeus]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>T1 is NOT full of plot holes. It has always been a great action film and still is today, even with all the so-called "sophisticated" ones out now. It's awesome, just not as good as T2</div>

[kali o.]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Heh...I have that movie on tape. I have no idea which is worse: Arnolds dubbed voice or the constant saloon soundtrack.</div>

[Slappy White]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Now I didn't say Commando was bad. It's just cheesy as hell. I like Commando alot actually. It's hilarious. Some of the best one liners ever.</div>

[Slappy White]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>If you saw that then it's possible that you saw "Pumping Iron", a documentary, where Arnold is a supreme asshole.</div>

[Slappy White]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>The slow-mo scene in Tech Noir is friggin awesome, where he first finds Sara Conner.</div>

[G-man Joe]

<div style='font: 11pt "Fine Hand"; text-align: left; '>Sheesh! THe mind game he played against Lou Ferrigno! Poor guy!</div>

[Slappy White]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Exactly</div>

[kali o.]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>No, I haven't....but now I have to find it.</div>

[Kupek]

<div style='font: 10pt verdana; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '><b>Link:</b> <a href="http://www.iompao.com/ercole.html">http ... le.html</a>

Just by looking at these pictures I can tell that it's cheesier than Commando.</div>

[Kupek]

<div style='font: 10pt verdana; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '><b>Link:</b> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/ ... 5379947</a>

Well, if you really want it...</div>

[kali o.]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Heh....I was thinking in a blockbuster/$3.00 sorta way....</div>

[Zeus]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Didn't Terminator basically start the whole sci-fi action thing? If not start, then definetely bring it into the mainstream. It's also took Arnold from being a big action star to being "Ahnold", THE action star</div>

[Kupek]

<div style='font: 10pt verdana; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>No, that would be Alien. The Terminator, 1984; Alien, 1979.</div>

[Slappy White]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>I see Alien as a Sci-fi Horror flick, not an action movie.</div>

[G-man Joe]

<div style='font: 11pt "Fine Hand"; text-align: left; '>Sci-Fi never ebbed since Star Wars. There was always Star Trek, AlienS, Predator series and a few notables like Blade Runner and Dune.</div>

[Zeus]

<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Alien was sci-fi suspense. Terminator was pure action</div>