The Other Worlds Shrine

Your place for discussion about RPGs, gaming, music, movies, anime, computers, sports, and any other stuff we care to talk about... 

  • One actual complaint I have about The Two Towers. (Minor spoilers, I guess.)

  • Your favorite band sucks, and you have terrible taste in movies.
Your favorite band sucks, and you have terrible taste in movies.
 #52817  by Kupek
 Tue Dec 24, 2002 11:44 am
<div style='font: 10pt verdana; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>The dwarf was used for comic relief almost every time he had a speaking part. It got old, and it took away from the drama of some scenes - battle scenes in particular.</div>

 #52819  by Tessian
 Tue Dec 24, 2002 12:33 pm
<div style='font: 11pt Dominion; text-align: left; '>hmm...true, except the whole kill competition he had with Legolas was in the book; I enjoyed listening to that :)</div>
 #52821  by kali o.
 Tue Dec 24, 2002 1:55 pm
<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>...which lessened the "shame" I couldn't help but feel during many other stretches of the movie.

Frankly, if it wasn't for Gollum and Gimli, most movie-goers would have been smothered to death by the sheer dorkiness of LotR....

God...everytime I see that movie, the scene with Gandalf summoning the horse makes me cringe...

KO-</div>

 #52823  by Zeus
 Tue Dec 24, 2002 2:37 pm
<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Yeah, I kinda agree. It did serve as a bit of a distraction and took away from his character quite a bit</div>

 #52824  by Kupek
 Tue Dec 24, 2002 2:47 pm
<div style='font: 10pt verdana; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>That wasn't too bad. Could have been implemented better, but the rest of the stuff was worse.</div>
 #52825  by Lox
 Tue Dec 24, 2002 3:17 pm
<div style='font: bold 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Gollum doing his back and forth between his two personalities. Holy shit was that funny. :) Now, the rest was awesome as well, but I love a good laugh, especially when I don't expect it.</div>

 #52826  by Tessian
 Tue Dec 24, 2002 4:17 pm
<div style='font: 11pt Dominion; text-align: left; '>heh yeah, that was because of those damned globes he had for eyes...everything he said made people laugh :P</div>
 #52827  by Flip
 Tue Dec 24, 2002 8:36 pm
<div style='font: 12pt "Cooper Black"; text-align: left; '>and especially during the 'summoning' of Shadowfax. It looked like a horse, nothing more nothing less. Why did they have to play it in super slow motion for 5 minutes? gah.</div>

 #52828  by Kupek
 Tue Dec 24, 2002 9:06 pm
<div style='font: 10pt verdana; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>That scene was rather cheesey, but it was brief. The Lord of the Rings IS dorky, I don't feel any need to aplogize to general audiences.</div>

 #52829  by Kupek
 Tue Dec 24, 2002 9:08 pm
<div style='font: 10pt verdana; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>That was excellent. As my brother said, Gollum puts Lucas' work to shame.</div>

 #52830  by Zeus
 Tue Dec 24, 2002 10:00 pm
<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>The new Yoda? No man, that looked amazing too</div>

 #52831  by Kupek
 Tue Dec 24, 2002 10:36 pm
<div style='font: 10pt verdana; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>Not as good as this. I believe Gollum was there, even when he had contact with the actors.</div>

 #52834  by SineSwiper
 Wed Dec 25, 2002 12:56 am
<div style='font: 11pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light"; text-align: left; '>Gollum -WAS- there. There was an actor playing Gollum, with facial expressions and all. He had a CGI skin afterwards, but so what.</div>

 #52835  by SineSwiper
 Wed Dec 25, 2002 12:58 am
<div style='font: 11pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light"; text-align: left; '>I noticed that. The first one didn't quite have the same thing, but maybe he didn't speak much in the first one.</div>

 #52838  by Zeus
 Wed Dec 25, 2002 2:05 am
<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Like Sine said, the vast majority of the shots used were with Serkis in the shot with the actors and Gollum superimposed on top of him. They both look incredible, but to say one looked better than that other....that's stretching it. It's tough to say which is better</div>
 #52839  by Kupek
 Wed Dec 25, 2002 2:12 am
<div style='font: 10pt verdana; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>Some of those facial expressions were highly exaggerated by the CG, but I thought that was a great touch. Whoever voiced him did an excellent job; it was the combination of voice and the visuals that sold Gollum.</div>

 #52840  by Kupek
 Wed Dec 25, 2002 2:27 am
<div style='font: 10pt verdana; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>Does that matter? (That there was an actor and he was replaced.) Yoda has two faces: his stern face, and his stern-and-perplexed face. Gollum acted real.</div>

 #52842  by Zeus
 Wed Dec 25, 2002 8:55 am
<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Definetely. A huge part of an actor's performace is how he/she reacts to the world around them and vice versa. And Yoda only needed 2 faces to stay true to the puppet</div>

 #52843  by Zeus
 Wed Dec 25, 2002 8:56 am
<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>Agreed on the combination part</div>

 #52844  by Derithian
 Wed Dec 25, 2002 3:05 pm
<div style='font: italic bold 14pt ; text-align: center; '>Give the butters's my precious</div>

 #52862  by Andrew, Killer Bee
 Mon Dec 30, 2002 3:09 am
<div style='font: 10pt georgia; text-align: left; '>I would have had a problem with it if he hadn't remained an ass-kicking machine. But he was, so... :)</div>