The Other Worlds Shrine

Your place for discussion about RPGs, gaming, music, movies, anime, computers, sports, and any other stuff we care to talk about... 

  • If you haven't seen Big Fish, go.....now. It's an amazing film and it's a travesty it wasn't nominated for best picture

  • Your favorite band sucks, and you have terrible taste in movies.
Your favorite band sucks, and you have terrible taste in movies.
 #57572  by Zeus
 Tue Jan 27, 2004 11:32 pm
<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>If you haven't seen Big Fish, go.....now. It's an amazing film and it's a travesty it wasn't nominated for best picture</div>

 #57573  by G-man Joe
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 12:36 am
<div style='font: 11pt "Fine Hand"; text-align: left; '>That's coz it's for the NEXT Academy Awards.</div>

 #57578  by Flip
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 8:11 am
<div style='font: 12pt "Cooper Black"; text-align: left; '>see, Zeus, we're in 2004 now, hope you can join us sometime soon :)</div>

 #57580  by the Gray
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 10:39 am
<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>Actually, Zeus is right. It was released in selected theatres in Dec '03 to get in under the academy deadline.</div>

 #57581  by G-man Joe
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 11:47 am
<div style='font: 11pt "Fine Hand"; text-align: left; '>But it wasn't the Official release date, was it?</div>

 #57582  by the Gray
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 12:04 pm
<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>Official date was Jan 12th. I think it was considered, but the movies that were nominated definately deserved it. While I liked Big Fish, I don't think it was as good as others that were nominated, like Lost in Translation.</div>

 #57584  by Torgo
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 12:44 pm
<div style='font: 9pt Arial; text-align: left; '>Good movie. Defnitely one to get on DVD.</div>

 #57589  by Gentz
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 2:37 pm
<div style='font: 11pt arial; text-align: left; '>Are you kidding me? Fucking SEABISCUIT is nominated! If a movie like that is setting the standards I'm surprised not to see the latest Girls Gone Wild video on the list.</div>

 #57591  by ManaMan
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:44 pm
<div style='font: 12pt Arial; text-align: left; '>Pretty awesome movie...You can definitely see that it's a Tim Burton movie, although it's not as blatantly obvious (weird) as in his other movies.</div>

 #57592  by Shellie
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 6:46 pm
<div style='font: 10pt georgia; text-align: left; '>Is it? It looks completely silly in the preview.</div>

 #57595  by Derithian
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 8:02 pm
<div style='font: italic bold 14pt ; text-align: center; '>Why? because you didn't like it?</div>

 #57597  by Gentz
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 9:29 pm
<div style='font: 11pt arial; text-align: left; '>Because one of the more obvious heaps of sappy, pretentious, over the top, trite, cliche, Hollywood horseshit (pun intended) that I've seen come out in quite a while. A real "Triumph of the Human Spirit" as it were, because, as we all know, that has NEVER before been attempted!</div>

 #57598  by Gentz
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 9:31 pm
<div style='font: 11pt arial; text-align: left; '>Also I've been reading too much Mr. Cranky as of late.</div>

 #57599  by Gentz
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 9:34 pm
<div style='font: 11pt arial; text-align: left; '>AND ANOTHER THING! If you're implying that there are no objective standards with which we can judge the artistic quality of a film, then the entire Oscar/Academy premise is devoid of meaning anyway.</div>

 #57600  by Gentz
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 9:34 pm
<div style='font: 11pt arial; text-align: left; '>Can I finish? PLEASE! CAN I FINISH??? .....Ok, I'm finished.</div>

 #57602  by Gentz
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 9:38 pm
<div style='font: 11pt arial; text-align: left; '>Well, it's Tim Burton. That's part of his greatness</div>

 #57603  by Kupek
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 9:46 pm
<div style='font: 10pt verdana; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>Well, I don't think that anyone is under the delusion that the Academy is objective. I mean, they can't be, by the mere fact it's comprised of people in the industry. It's just their way of saying "I like your work."</div>

 #57604  by Zeus
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 10:07 pm
<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>If you have a good imagination and know someone who loves to tell stories (or do yourself), you should enjoy it very much.</div>

 #57606  by Zeus
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 10:09 pm
<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>It had limited release, should be up unless they refused it</div>

 #57607  by Zeus
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 10:10 pm
<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>I loved Lost in Transaltion, too. But man, MASTER AND COMMANDER WAS FREAKIN' NOMINATED!</div>

 #57608  by Shellie
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 10:33 pm
<div style='font: 10pt georgia; text-align: left; '>If its anything like Nightmare before Christmas, Ill like it...it just looks kooky. heh</div>

 #57609  by Kupek
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 11:14 pm
<div style='font: 10pt verdana; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>I don't know about Oscar worthy, but I thought it was a good movie.</div>

 #57610  by G-man Joe
 Wed Jan 28, 2004 11:36 pm
<div style='font: 11pt "Fine Hand"; text-align: left; '>And the travesty of all is 90% of the movie actually happened in real life! We need 100% fiction! =8^)</div>

 #57611  by Ishamael
 Thu Jan 29, 2004 12:17 am
<div style='font: 14pt "Sans Serif"; text-align: justify; padding: 0% 15% 0% 15%; '>Out of all the movies in the list, that was probably my fave...</div>

 #57619  by Gentz
 Thu Jan 29, 2004 6:07 pm
<div style='font: 11pt arial; text-align: left; '>Well, certainly not. But Derithian seemed to be claiming that I don't think Seabiscuit should be nominated just because I "didn't like it." Which is ridiculous. I mean, I didn't even SEE the movie! : )</div>

 #57623  by Derithian
 Thu Jan 29, 2004 7:27 pm
<div style='font: italic bold 14pt ; text-align: center; '>exactly but it was a suprisingly good movie. I was amazed because I had thought it was goi9ng to suck too</div>

 #57627  by Gentz
 Thu Jan 29, 2004 8:40 pm
<div style='font: 11pt arial; text-align: left; '>Burton was actually just the producer on NBC. Think more Edward Scissorhands</div>

 #57631  by Derithian
 Fri Jan 30, 2004 1:05 am
<div style='font: italic bold 14pt ; text-align: center; '>that movie was in there just because of Russel Crowe. The script for that movie was freakin hooribly filled with holes</div>

 #57632  by Shellie
 Fri Jan 30, 2004 2:03 am
<div style='font: 10pt georgia; text-align: left; '>ahhh...nifty.</div>

 #57633  by Kupek
 Fri Jan 30, 2004 10:30 am
<div style='font: 10pt verdana; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>I thought Paul Bettany, the surgeon, had the best performance.</div>

 #57634  by Derithian
 Fri Jan 30, 2004 12:30 pm
<div style='font: italic bold 14pt ; text-align: center; '>good point. but I mean the movie script was so full of holes they were bailing water the whole time. I commend them on a good job but in the end the ship still sunk. At least wiht Pirates of the Carribean Johnny Depp was able to keep the boat afloat long enough to make it to the dock.</div>

 #57635  by Ishamael
 Fri Jan 30, 2004 3:40 pm
<div style='font: 14pt "Sans Serif"; text-align: justify; padding: 0% 15% 0% 15%; '>Full of holes? I thought it was a great script. It actually made me want to read the books. What holes did you find?</div>