The Other Worlds Shrine

Your place for discussion about RPGs, gaming, music, movies, anime, computers, sports, and any other stuff we care to talk about... 

  • Lucas gets AFI Lifetime Achievement award..

  • Your favorite band sucks, and you have terrible taste in movies.
Your favorite band sucks, and you have terrible taste in movies.

 #88731  by Kupek
 Mon Jun 13, 2005 4:25 pm
I think that's a no-brainer. The influence of Star Wars is obvious, but he's also been behind major advancements in related technology.

 #88745  by the Gray
 Mon Jun 13, 2005 6:22 pm
Forget Star Wars.

THX, 5.1 and 6.1 sound exist because of Lucas. They've done more for Hollywood than American Graffiti, SW's or Indiana Jones. (Willow and Labrinyth don't count, although I love them)

So yeah, for his innovations Lucas totally deserves it. Not for his movies though.

 #88772  by Zeus
 Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:18 am
Star Wars started the entire idea of blockbusters, made Fox into a studio to be recokoned with, and is easily one of the most influencial movies of all time, so he'd almost get it even for that one movie alone. Not to mention THX mastering and remastering are the industry standard, ILM is still the measuring stick for any effects house, Pixar was started - and sold by, in maybe the worst move ever - by Lucas which, in turn, revolutionized 3D animation, and he completely revolutionized both music and sound effects usage in films as we know it (starting with Star Wars, of course).

He'd done so much on many different levels that both you and Kupek touched on as well as some none of us probably remembered. And that's not including the other media he's been rather heavily involved in, including LucasArts which was not allowed, in the beginning, that is, to even make licenced stuff (ie. Star Wars or Indiana Jones), which is how we ended up with Sam and Max, Day of the Tenticle, and Grim Fandango (among others). See that "lack of originality" post in Gamethought for an interview with one of the original LucasArts game designers (he just did Psychonauts) for a little more detail.

Of course, he's had a helluva lot of good people behind him to do all this. At the end of the day, he only knows how to write (that's debatable), direct (that's not; see American Graffitti), and edit films (he's considered by many one of the best editors around). Those are his skills, but he's smart enough to surround himself with people who invent these things and gives them the means, direction, and even provides some of the vision to do it (Lucas: "What if we cleaned up Star Wars to make the video much nicer to catch up to today's technological advances?"; voila, we have THX).

We may not agree with everything he does, but he is a brilliant businessman and a helluva leader. That's why he's a multi-billionaire with a ton of influence in Hollywood rather than a director working on the fringe of the studio system. Well, that and he had the foresight to include all merchandising and intellectual property rights to Star Wars as a franchise in his original director's fee, plus 40% of the gross :-) That would NEVER happen nowadays, but back then, that meant nothing.

 #88777  by Ishamael
 Tue Jun 14, 2005 1:45 am
Absolutely it's a nobrainer. We can nitpick the guy all we want, but denying this guy has left a huge legacy is sort of like being a member of the Flat Earth Society.

 #88787  by Nev
 Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:03 am
This is true. Though I for one wish Hollywood would make a few more pre-Star-Wars early 70's-style human dramas like Chinatown and a few less movies where things blow up randomly.

 #88792  by Zeus
 Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:33 pm
Mental wrote:This is true. Though I for one wish Hollywood would make a few more pre-Star-Wars early 70's-style human dramas like Chinatown and a few less movies where things blow up randomly.
They're starting to move away from the blockbusters VERY slowly since their takes have dimished a little bit and they've started to realize that it's better to have a $40 mil budget and make $60 mil at the boxoffice (before DVDs) rather than risk $200 mil and pray to make back $250. There's still a market, but you're seeing the smaller budget stuff so much more than you did, say, 5 years ago.

If you want these human dramas, look more at the indie films. They get a lot more play now and you can see the trailers at Apple or Yahoo all the time. Then you at least have an idea of what to look for

 #88796  by Nev
 Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:59 pm
True. I dunno, I ought to get to the movies more often anyway. I think I saw, like, four, in the entirety of last year.

 #88817  by Zeus
 Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:07 pm
Check out the trailers, you might be convinced to head to a local indie theatre if you start looking at the smaller films that may fit more of the idea of what you want

 #88820  by Nev
 Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:50 pm
I usually do go to those when I see movies lately, but these days I'm too busy.