Ishamael wrote:Zeus wrote: Wouldn't it be best if you got a house? NOt sure what the housing prices are like, but it's better than paying rent for the rest of your life. At least you're building equity this way
That's a myth that needs to be squelched. Buying a house and building equity is *not* always better than renting. Like many things, there are no absolute rules here and the situation changes from person to person. But you should only buy a house if you plan on living in an area for a while and want to live in a house, NOT because you're building equity, getting tax breaks, etc....much of this turns out to be a crock for many people anyway.
I agree, to a point. If you plan on staying in a place for 3 or more years, it'll be worth it. Less, it's not. My uncle is buying homes for his three kids through loans (no money down) while they go to uni and by the time the 3-4 year programs are done, he's got at least $5k built up in equity, once you factor in the interest, not including the increases in the values of the homes. So it works that way, at least you're getting something back. And since you've got other renters, it's basically costing him nothing as the additional rent above his kids pays for the mortgage.
If you're living in the same place for 3-4 years, you're often paying roughly the same if you can get yourself a roomie as you would renting, so you'd see the equity build up that way while paying the same for rent. That's how it can work up here, anyways.
But if you move every year, it's dumb. I agree about that.