To: VIZ Media and Cartoon Network
I'm writing this letter to address a couple of issues with the localization process of Naruto. I am also sending this letter to Cartoon Network, since your American broadcaster would be highly interested in any problems with one of their most popular new anime series to hit their block. Naruto is insanely popular in Japan, so I'm a little baffled at why the localization effort wasn't handled with kids' gloves to begin with.
I'll start with the smaller issue: dubbing. Why hand over the dubbing effort of such a potential cash cow to Studiopolis, a dubbing house with barely any experience? Furthermore, why give the lead voice to a relative newbie in the industry? Naruto's voice sounds like an inexperienced dub with Maile Flanagan's female voice leaking through. Some of the other voices range from almost spot-on (Sakura, Sasuke in some degrees, Ino) to having the wrong tone (The Third = too dark, Kakashi = not dark enough, Shikamaru = too smarmy, Hinata = sounds like she's having an orgasm every time she speaks). I'm not saying that overall Naruto is a completely bad dub, but after getting used to companies like ZRO Limit/Animaze (Ghost in the Shell: SAC, Cowboy Bebop, Fullmetal Alchemist), New Generation Pictures' dubbing of Hellsing, or even Geneon Entertainment's handling of Samurai Champloo, I'd have to say that I'm a little disappointed. To be fair, sometimes voice actors/actresses need a few episodes to adjust their character's voices, so I will give it time.
Actually, the much larger issue is what could potentially ruin the English version of Naruto altogether: censorship. Marketing the series for a TV-PG audience is a horrible, horrible mistake. Since the show is above TV-Y7 and below TV-14, I would have to assume that you think that the target audience is 10-year-olds. Despite its kiddie cast (popular among anime of any audience range) and initial mild beginnings, Naruto is -NOT- a show for little 10-year-olds! Anybody that advances past the first 5-6 episodes will see that. Let's recap what's been censored in the first three episodes: nose bleeds, a goofy accidential kiss, and toilet paper. This may seem like somewhat mild things to censor, and relatively unimportant, but this is merely the calm before the storm. The first instance shows that a no-blood policy is in effect, and the last two just show how far you'll go to censor it.
Naruto is a bloody anime. Let me repeat that, because I know you've (mostly) only had experience with Y7 anime like Zatch Bell and Hamtaro. Naruto is a bloody anime. These little kids are ninjas. The whole point of the series is about ninjas, ninjas that kill, torture, maim, and yes, bleed through the series. This isn't something like Dragonball Z, despite the similar popularities. Even your TV-14 series, Inu Yasha, doesn't really compare to the amount of violence that Naruto has. Granted, it's no Ninja Scroll, and it wouldn't be something that would fall under an untouchable TV-MA rating, but TV-PG it is not.
For a TV-PG rating to even fly in the later episodes, there's a number of scenes that you would really have to think about. In Episode 6, on the first real fight scene, how are you going to handle Naruto stabbing his own hand to bleed out the poison from his system? In Episode 17, how are you going to deal with a story about a kid killing his own father? In Episode 18, how are you going to deal with that same kid getting stabbed in the heart by an energy blast (oh ho, lots of blood there, too)? In Episode 28, how are you going to deal with Naruto being digested by a huge snake, and then blowing up said snake? In Episode 71, what about resurrection of the dead? In Episode 73, what about the Third getting slowly stabbed by a sword (and the constant reminders of that conflict several episodes further)? In Episode 82, what about Kakashi crucified on a cross being stabbed constantly for three days? (Hmmm...religious overtones as well as torture and brutality. What? Are you going to cut the entire scene out?)
That was just a very small and partial list of potential areas that would have to be censored in a TV-PG environment. Was this looked at in advance? Or was the game plan to set a target audience first and mold the show to their tastes later? Even if you did censor the show to a mess of friendly bits, parents of 10-year-old kids would be writing letters about exposing their kid to the content that you do allow to air. Kid ninjas killing other ninjas with daggers, and stories of confused characters with horrible childhood traumas (Sasuke and close to half of the villians in the series)? Not even GI Joe or Dragonball Z had that sort of exposure to a 10-year-old child.
I'm writing this letter to address a couple of issues with the localization process of Naruto. I am also sending this letter to Cartoon Network, since your American broadcaster would be highly interested in any problems with one of their most popular new anime series to hit their block. Naruto is insanely popular in Japan, so I'm a little baffled at why the localization effort wasn't handled with kids' gloves to begin with.
I'll start with the smaller issue: dubbing. Why hand over the dubbing effort of such a potential cash cow to Studiopolis, a dubbing house with barely any experience? Furthermore, why give the lead voice to a relative newbie in the industry? Naruto's voice sounds like an inexperienced dub with Maile Flanagan's female voice leaking through. Some of the other voices range from almost spot-on (Sakura, Sasuke in some degrees, Ino) to having the wrong tone (The Third = too dark, Kakashi = not dark enough, Shikamaru = too smarmy, Hinata = sounds like she's having an orgasm every time she speaks). I'm not saying that overall Naruto is a completely bad dub, but after getting used to companies like ZRO Limit/Animaze (Ghost in the Shell: SAC, Cowboy Bebop, Fullmetal Alchemist), New Generation Pictures' dubbing of Hellsing, or even Geneon Entertainment's handling of Samurai Champloo, I'd have to say that I'm a little disappointed. To be fair, sometimes voice actors/actresses need a few episodes to adjust their character's voices, so I will give it time.
Actually, the much larger issue is what could potentially ruin the English version of Naruto altogether: censorship. Marketing the series for a TV-PG audience is a horrible, horrible mistake. Since the show is above TV-Y7 and below TV-14, I would have to assume that you think that the target audience is 10-year-olds. Despite its kiddie cast (popular among anime of any audience range) and initial mild beginnings, Naruto is -NOT- a show for little 10-year-olds! Anybody that advances past the first 5-6 episodes will see that. Let's recap what's been censored in the first three episodes: nose bleeds, a goofy accidential kiss, and toilet paper. This may seem like somewhat mild things to censor, and relatively unimportant, but this is merely the calm before the storm. The first instance shows that a no-blood policy is in effect, and the last two just show how far you'll go to censor it.
Naruto is a bloody anime. Let me repeat that, because I know you've (mostly) only had experience with Y7 anime like Zatch Bell and Hamtaro. Naruto is a bloody anime. These little kids are ninjas. The whole point of the series is about ninjas, ninjas that kill, torture, maim, and yes, bleed through the series. This isn't something like Dragonball Z, despite the similar popularities. Even your TV-14 series, Inu Yasha, doesn't really compare to the amount of violence that Naruto has. Granted, it's no Ninja Scroll, and it wouldn't be something that would fall under an untouchable TV-MA rating, but TV-PG it is not.
For a TV-PG rating to even fly in the later episodes, there's a number of scenes that you would really have to think about. In Episode 6, on the first real fight scene, how are you going to handle Naruto stabbing his own hand to bleed out the poison from his system? In Episode 17, how are you going to deal with a story about a kid killing his own father? In Episode 18, how are you going to deal with that same kid getting stabbed in the heart by an energy blast (oh ho, lots of blood there, too)? In Episode 28, how are you going to deal with Naruto being digested by a huge snake, and then blowing up said snake? In Episode 71, what about resurrection of the dead? In Episode 73, what about the Third getting slowly stabbed by a sword (and the constant reminders of that conflict several episodes further)? In Episode 82, what about Kakashi crucified on a cross being stabbed constantly for three days? (Hmmm...religious overtones as well as torture and brutality. What? Are you going to cut the entire scene out?)
That was just a very small and partial list of potential areas that would have to be censored in a TV-PG environment. Was this looked at in advance? Or was the game plan to set a target audience first and mold the show to their tastes later? Even if you did censor the show to a mess of friendly bits, parents of 10-year-old kids would be writing letters about exposing their kid to the content that you do allow to air. Kid ninjas killing other ninjas with daggers, and stories of confused characters with horrible childhood traumas (Sasuke and close to half of the villians in the series)? Not even GI Joe or Dragonball Z had that sort of exposure to a 10-year-old child.
Rosalina: But you didn't.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.
Robert: But I DON'T.
Rosalina: You sure that's right?
Robert: I was going to HAVE told you they'd come?
Rosalina: No.
Robert: The subjunctive?
Rosalina: That's not the subjunctive.
Robert: I don't think the syntax has been invented yet.
Rosalina: It would have had to have had been.
Robert: Had to have...had...been? That can't be right.