Burn!Don Wang wrote:I wouldn't say Naruto is worse than Inuyasha, and Inuyasha does have a plot. The main character is Inuyasha's sword and the plot is about how the sword becomes stronger.
(looks distressed)Don Wang wrote:I wouldn't say Naruto is worse than Inuyasha, and Inuyasha does have a plot. The main character is Inuyasha's sword and the plot is about how the sword becomes stronger.
I think that just flew past your head, Mental.Mental wrote:(looks distressed)
Dear merciful God, is this a real anime?
Where would the Internet be without people yelling their uneducated opinions at everyone? I shudder to think of that world!Mental wrote:Are you trying to say I don't know my anime?
Dude, I'm awesome with anime.
That is, as long as by "anime" you actually mean "not ever watching any anime, but making uneducated comments about it anyway, and making fun of people who watch it all the time."
You can't be serious. Inuyasha has more in-depth characters than Naruto?! Lemme see, we have this really fucking annoying girl with about as much interesting personality as a Biniraen Battleslug. Then we have Inuyasha, who is pretty damn one-dimension as characters go. And his brother, who wants power. Everybody else is a minor character that nobody gives a shit about.Ishamael wrote:The difference is characters. Inuyasha has interesting characters and an interesting background that's revealed slowly over the show. (Try to guess who my favorite one is.) Inuyasha's sword really is a side prop for developing the characters.
And yes, even DBZ has more interesting characters than Naruto. Goku stays about the same, but nearly all the others grow and change in different ways. I'ts kind of cool and the variety of characters make it feel you aren't watching the same thing over and over again...OK, it makes SOME of us feel that way (Looking at Zeus). Also DBZ has Vegeta. :)
I guess the best way I can explain DBZ and Inuyasha is that somehow, the writers keep putting characters in interesting situations to keep you watching. Yeah that doesn't necessarily make a plot, but none of these things has much plot so that's out anyway. I guess that's why I'm not as high on Naruto...same kind of fighting anime action, but with worse characters. It's like they got the guys who didn't make cast of Pokeman and decided to make them ninjas.
No, I don't think that fights are the most important thing, since I think character is really important. However, for a "fighting anime serial", I'd expect the battles to not be predictable and boring.Ishamael wrote:If the fights are the most important thing for you, then you should indeed stick to Naruto.
Look, man. I know my Maruto. And my Innuyaba. AND my Dragon Ball B.Ishamael wrote:Where would the Internet be without people yelling their uneducated opinions at everyone? I shudder to think of that world!Mental wrote:Are you trying to say I don't know my anime?
Dude, I'm awesome with anime.
That is, as long as by "anime" you actually mean "not ever watching any anime, but making uneducated comments about it anyway, and making fun of people who watch it all the time."
Yeah that sword is bonkers, I've seen it go through like 4 new power ups in the past 2 months.Don Wang wrote:First of all if you want to talk history, nothing comes close to Dragonball's gross sales and popularity. Stuff like Inuyasha is a league above Naruto is terms of popularity. So no you don't have history on your side.
Now with that said...
Naruto is obviously inferior to the other Dragonball clone, One Piece (which has claimed #3 all time manga sales now) but there's a lot of room for Dragonball clones in the Japanese market. With Shonen Jump unable to produce another breakout manga (Death Note was the closest thing that could've been one), Naruto ends up picking a lot of weight for the leading Japanese weekly manga serial and is unsurprisingly popular because of that. Any junk you can get serialized on Shonen Jump is going to be popular, especially one of the flagship titles. To be fair Naruto isn't all that bad. It tries too hard with adding depths to a bunch of characters that, if you cared about them, would actually be good. Problem is that Naruto doesn't have a franchise character that it can put the face on a manga and say 'go buy because soandso's face is on it' so trying to develop the characters won't work.
Contrast that with say, Death Note's L or Black Cat's Train Heartnet or every single character in Prince of Tennis (after all it's got nothing else going for it) which managed to salvage trainwreck stories because they exist. This may be an artistic limitation as opposed to writing limitation but that's the way it goes. It seems like you either get someone with artistic ability or writing ability, but not both.
As for Inuyasha, it has gone on way too long that I think even the author forgot there was supposed to a plot or that characters exist. The only thing that still ties everything together is the Inuyasha's sword which has gone through about 5 powerups and is just one powerup away from being able to defeat Naraku like it did 5 powerups ago. Even collecting the soul gem seems to be forgotten since they've only been 'a few fragments' away from completing for about 5 years now. But since it's still raking in money and making Rumiko Takahashi the highest tax-paying individual in Japan, so I guess there's no motivation to deviate from the status quo.
LOL! Who's rule is that? I've never heard of it. And EVERYTHING I said can be inferred from it? Really? Are you sure about that? You might want to re-read my post carefully. But then again, I don't know how much ground the "handsome guy is never really a bad guy" rule covers so maybe it does "easily" go over everything mentioned. And if I can provide counter-examples, does it remain a rule? Hmm, lots of questions to ponder here.Don Wang wrote:Inuyasha doesn't even pretend it has a plot anymore.
What you said about Inuyasha's brother can be easily inferred by the 'the handsome guy is never really a bad guy' rule.
Sine was making a subtle Tom Cruise reference.Don Wang wrote:First of all if you want to talk history, nothing comes close to Dragonball's gross sales and popularity. Stuff like Inuyasha is a league above Naruto is terms of popularity. So no you don't have history on your side.
...Directed at Mental. Oh well, at least somebody caught the reference.Kupek wrote:Sine was making a subtle Tom Cruise reference.
Sorry, I've been skipping over most of the thread, since I really don't know a damn thing about any of these series.SineSwiper wrote:...Directed at Mental. Oh well, at least somebody caught the reference.Kupek wrote:Sine was making a subtle Tom Cruise reference.
True I haven't seen much Naruto (yet), and even though it may seem like I'm down on the show, I actually do think it's OK. I just don't think it's as good as Inuyasha or DBZ.SineSwiper wrote:The complexities of villians in Naruto far out-trumps any complexities between Sesshomaru and Inuyasha. Just trying to unravel Gaara shows exactly how different he is from a normal person, yet Naruto can actually sympathize with him, based on his experence as a person alone.
I dunno how much you've watched of Naruto, but it sounds like it's not much.
Like I told Sine, not a whole lot so I'm trying to take that into account too. I'll keep watching or perhaps throw a few into my Netflix queue (if it's available there) to get caught up.Tortolia wrote:How much Naruto have you seen, anyway? I'm not a Naruto fanboy or anything, but it didn't really click with me on any level until the episodes in the 30s or so.
It doesn't really get moving until after the second major fight, about ep 15-20. The necessary build-up stuff. Then it doesn't slow down for 80 episodes...Ishamael wrote:True I haven't seen much Naruto (yet), and even though it may seem like I'm down on the show, I actually do think it's OK. I just don't think it's as good as Inuyasha or DBZ.SineSwiper wrote:The complexities of villians in Naruto far out-trumps any complexities between Sesshomaru and Inuyasha. Just trying to unravel Gaara shows exactly how different he is from a normal person, yet Naruto can actually sympathize with him, based on his experence as a person alone.
I dunno how much you've watched of Naruto, but it sounds like it's not much.
And yes it may turn out there may be more texture than what's seen on the surface,but I haven't seen any evidence to support that.
You don't seem to find any complexity there because you just dumbed down the characters to support your argument. It's called a straw man argument.Don Wang wrote:Garra - a guy born with a sucky childhood and used like a weapon. Naruto related to him because he's basically the same thing, and he's friends with basically anyone anyway.
I fail to see any complexity here.
Actually, it was their complexity that precisely made them interesting. If Hamlet was simply a story about a "son trying to kill the uncle who killed his father", we wouldn't be reading about it.Don Wang wrote:Anyway, what's people's obsession with complexity being good? I don't recall most of Shakespeare's characters being horribly complex but that doesn't stop him from writing a good play. Complexity without meaning is simply meaningless. A character doesn't have to be juggling 7 priorities at the same time to be an interesting character.