Page 2 of 2
Eh, you're still a fag to me...
PostPosted:Sun Nov 18, 2001 2:37 am
by Gentz
<div style='font: 11pt arial; text-align: left; '>Heh. Er, wait, it's not offensive <i>now</i>, is it? : )
Seriously though...either way, you're still probably a lot less homophobic than most anybody here (Mental included)...hence the irony...</div>
PostPosted:Sun Nov 18, 2001 2:38 am
by Gentz
<div style='font: 11pt arial; text-align: left; '>Heh. I'm no longer a smoker, actually...</div>
PostPosted:Sun Nov 18, 2001 2:40 am
by Gentz
<div style='font: 11pt arial; text-align: left; '>I dunno...bi is a pretty ambiguous term, i suppose</div>
PostPosted:Sun Nov 18, 2001 2:56 pm
by Drew S.
<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>Come on, don't give me that. That was a joke. Sine didn't mean that in a derogatory sense, or if he did, then I reverse my opinion. There's a difference between joking around and bashing.</div>
PostPosted:Sun Nov 18, 2001 2:58 pm
by Drew S.
<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>again, not worth it</div>
Don't necesssarily disagree with your definition...
PostPosted:Mon Nov 19, 2001 11:53 pm
by EsquE
<div style='font: 12pt Baskerville; text-align: left; '>...<i>but I don't really have a problem with the term bi-sexual. It's a lot quicker than trying to explain to people that I have "more wide open sexual preferences". I actually have very limited sexual preferences, I just don't care if those are met by a male or female...
...as for this little soiree concerning the use of the words gay and fag, it doesn't mean jack to me. It's the intent that matters, not the definition.
...I'm more concerned about the fact that I just used "soiree" in a sentence....that was sooooo gay...<i></div>