The Other Worlds Shrine

Your place for discussion about RPGs, gaming, music, movies, anime, computers, sports, and any other stuff we care to talk about... 

  • Damn Barret, How giddy is your St. Louis living ass....

  • Somehow, we still tolerate each other. Eventually this will be the only forum left.
Somehow, we still tolerate each other. Eventually this will be the only forum left.

 #135089  by Zeus
 Tue Apr 14, 2009 9:57 am
Who are they playin' in round 1 again? Is it Vancouver? That'll be a good matchup. They'll be against the best goalie in the world.

 #135101  by Chris
 Tue Apr 14, 2009 7:36 pm
Zeus wrote:Who are they playin' in round 1 again? Is it Vancouver? That'll be a good matchup. They'll be against the best goalie in the world.
2 great goalies with 2 good offenses. but the blues are hotter than me right now. funny enough outside of the sharks I can't see any of the favorites winning easily in the west while the east will pretty much just be the top except for maybe the Devils going down

 #135107  by Imakeholesinu
 Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:26 pm
Chris wrote:
Zeus wrote:Who are they playin' in round 1 again? Is it Vancouver? That'll be a good matchup. They'll be against the best goalie in the world.
2 great goalies with 2 good offenses. but the blues are hotter than me right now. funny enough outside of the sharks I can't see any of the favorites winning easily in the west while the east will pretty much just be the top except for maybe the Devils going down
The Blues are only hotter to you because you want Oshie's cheeks to keep you warm.

Mason has been absolutely stellar stepping in for Manny. Manny won't play up here next season and that's why Bishop was called up to back up Mason.

Vancouver only has two lines of offense. I think we've got a more balanced team. We will hopefully wear the Sedin twins and Sundin down. Two guys on their team I'm afraid of, Roberta and Burrows. Roberta can steal a game for them and Burrows...man the kid channels pat verbeek hit/score hit/score. 27 goals from this guy?

The Blues have the kid line though and Berglund likes to go fishing. Oshie will be the work horse he's been since the all-star break and Perron will continue to dangle, dazzle, and draw penalty after penalty.

If the playoffs are won on special teams, the Blues 3rd ranked PK and 8th ranked PP will certainly get them through this.

Blues in 5.

Oh and guess who has tickets to games 3 and 4 here in the STL??? THIS GUY!!!!

 #135126  by Zeus
 Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:20 am
Hold on. You're going up against the best goalie in the world who's playing quite well and you're predicting your team to win in 5? If they had Luongo and a bunch of cardboard cut-outs you'd be lucky to get it in 5. Has history not taught you anything? This is the playoffs not some regular season bunch of games.

This is going to be a long series. 6 at least if not 7. Vancouver has better forwards overall and are more experienced and at the end of the day, their goalie is playing very well and has more talent than any other goalie in the league right now. So I say they take it but it won't be easy.

 #135135  by Imakeholesinu
 Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:19 pm
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?DB_OEM_ ... &id=417597

Who won goal of the year? Oh and guess who it was against?

That's right it was Oshie vs. 3 Canunkleheads and Roberta.

 #135143  by Tessian
 Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:52 pm
Imakeholesinu wrote:
That's right it was Oshie vs. 3 Canunkleheads and Roberta.
I feel like I need a translator or something to understand this thread...

 #135146  by Mental
 Wed Apr 15, 2009 6:29 pm
Tessian wrote: I feel like I need a translator or something to understand this thread...
1. It's hockey!

2. Hockey involves large men brutally beating the shit out of each other and sometimes also hitting a small round hard puck with a stick.

3. North of the "freeze your ass off line" at the Canadian border, hockey is a national obsession. Canadians spent roughly 70% of their lives either playing or watching hockey and the rest submerged under the winter ice (where they hibernate to wait for hockey season).

4. Saying bad things to a Canadian (or Chris) about his or her favorite team will result in a pair of ice skates being shoved right up your ass.

5. Do not pee in the Stanley Cup.

And that is all I know.

 #135147  by kali o.
 Wed Apr 15, 2009 6:33 pm
Imakeholesinu wrote:http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?DB_OEM_ ... &id=417597

Who won goal of the year? Oh and guess who it was against?

That's right it was Oshie vs. 3 Canunkleheads and Roberta.
Wow...you are so desperate to find *proof* you are using a fan choice award? Hilarious.

Vancouver is walking through ya, I'll be nice and say in six. I'll visit this thread again and do my dance of always-right on the 26th :)

 #135151  by Chris
 Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:15 pm
Zeus wrote:Hold on. You're going up against the best goalie in the world who's playing quite well and you're predicting your team to win in 5? If they had Luongo and a bunch of cardboard cut-outs you'd be lucky to get it in 5. Has history not taught you anything? This is the playoffs not some regular season bunch of games.

This is going to be a long series. 6 at least if not 7. Vancouver has better forwards overall and are more experienced and at the end of the day, their goalie is playing very well and has more talent than any other goalie in the league right now. So I say they take it but it won't be easy.
yes history has tought me something. I'll look at how a team is playing when the playoffs come around. And the Blues have been playing a hell of a lot better than the Canucks.

 #135153  by Mental
 Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:19 pm
kali o. wrote:
Imakeholesinu wrote:http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?DB_OEM_ ... &id=417597

Who won goal of the year? Oh and guess who it was against?

That's right it was Oshie vs. 3 Canunkleheads and Roberta.
Wow...you are so desperate to find *proof* you are using a fan choice award? Hilarious.

Vancouver is walking through ya, I'll be nice and say in six. I'll visit this thread again and do my dance of always-right on the 26th :)
Ain't nothing wrong with the fan community. I tend to trust the fans of just about anything more than the "establishment" these days anyway, like I was just saying on the G.I. Joe thread on the other forum.

But, I don't follow hockey, so in the interest of full disclosure I must admit I know nothing and recuse myself from this thread now.

 #135155  by Zeus
 Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:02 pm
Chris wrote:
Zeus wrote:Hold on. You're going up against the best goalie in the world who's playing quite well and you're predicting your team to win in 5? If they had Luongo and a bunch of cardboard cut-outs you'd be lucky to get it in 5. Has history not taught you anything? This is the playoffs not some regular season bunch of games.

This is going to be a long series. 6 at least if not 7. Vancouver has better forwards overall and are more experienced and at the end of the day, their goalie is playing very well and has more talent than any other goalie in the league right now. So I say they take it but it won't be easy.
yes history has tought me something. I'll look at how a team is playing when the playoffs come around. And the Blues have been playing a hell of a lot better than the Canucks.
Not really. The Canucks went on a tear to win their division. That's what i was saying, they're both playin' very well. And with Luongo and a better overall forward group, I think that gives them the edge. But it'll be a close series

 #135172  by kali o.
 Thu Apr 16, 2009 1:46 am
Replay wrote: Ain't nothing wrong with the fan community. I tend to trust the fans of just about anything more than the "establishment" these days anyway, like I was just saying on the G.I. Joe thread on the other forum.

But, I don't follow hockey, so in the interest of full disclosure I must admit I know nothing and recuse myself from this thread now.
You don't have to follow hockey, but ya obviously didn't follow the link (otherwise, ya woulda known by simple commonsense how little that award had to do with anything). As for "fans" over the establishment, most voting polls I saw had the canucks winning that series at around 70ish %. Barret is just blind and bias...and Chris is psychotic. And both are American and therefore wrong on everything hockey related.

So ya, run along...

Anyway ya...one game down...I'm doing my pre-dance stretches :P

 #135182  by Zeus
 Thu Apr 16, 2009 8:53 am
*points and laughs*

 #135193  by Mental
 Thu Apr 16, 2009 2:51 pm
As far as I can tell, that award has to do with arguing about hockey, and this THREAD has to do with arguing about hockey as well! :)

Ergo, relevance. Q.E.D. FEEL THE BURN. A winner is me!

 #135263  by Chris
 Fri Apr 17, 2009 10:00 pm
Holy fuck. fleury tonight made one of the best saves I have ever seen midway through the third. he has been fucking fantastic this game

 #135266  by Imakeholesinu
 Sat Apr 18, 2009 1:47 am
Chris wrote:Holy fuck. fleury tonight made one of the best saves I have ever seen midway through the third. he has been fucking fantastic this game
Poor Philly....they are so awesome.

The Blues need to break out the 3rd jersey's on Sunday.

 #135270  by Zeus
 Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:58 am
*laugh starts turning hysterical*

 #135279  by kali o.
 Sat Apr 18, 2009 2:19 pm
*coughs*

*snickers*

/runs outta this thread laughing

 #135307  by kali o.
 Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:51 pm
Huh?

....

Oh my bad, thought ya said something.

/snickers

 #135310  by Zeus
 Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:25 am
*laughing gets a little stronger and audiable*

 #135320  by SineSwiper
 Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:46 am
I take it Canaidia won something?

 #135407  by kali o.
 Wed Apr 22, 2009 12:01 am
Man, that's what I get for being nice...4 days early and I'm not nearly stretched out enough to dance.

>:)

 #135411  by Zeus
 Wed Apr 22, 2009 5:38 am
Wow. I gave the Blues a little more credit than they deserved. Looks like they're gonna learn the Ottawa way

 #135414  by Chris
 Wed Apr 22, 2009 12:29 pm
Zeus wrote:Wow. I gave the Blues a little more credit than they deserved. Looks like they're gonna learn the Ottawa way
no ottawa goes futher before dissapointing. then they blow up their team to get better, alienate every player not named Alfreddson whose to busy enjoying the dick sucking they are giving him to care.

The Blues earned there way in and ran out of gas. THe difference was exactly what you said it would be Zeus. It was Luongo who was stellar. That was a good game yesterday though.

Right now I'm too busy being lectured on how when you are a goalie and initiate contact with someone skating backward a few feet outside the crease it's goaltender interference. no....no it's not...

 #135421  by Imakeholesinu
 Wed Apr 22, 2009 2:01 pm
That 3rd period scrum in front of the net you could see from the replay it was a goal. If O'Rourke hadn't had such a quick whistle then this wouldn't be an issue. The problem was though he then went to review it after he said he blew the play dead. According to the official rules, once a play has been blown dead by an official it is not reviewable. So when O'Rourke went to review then the play should have continued with the puck crossing the line while Roberta lay spread eagle on the ice.

The officiating was trash, but the Blues never took advantage especially in OT.

Perron, Tkachuk, MacDonald, and Mason were BY FAR the best players on the ice for the Blues last night. Mason kept them in the game.

Our Team Defense was poor. Jackman was out of position and coughed up the puck way to many times.

Berglund was benched the entire 2nd half of the 3rd period and all of OT, along with BJ Crombeen. The Blues were playing 3 lines and still outplayed the Canucks 70% of the game.

The Blues wanted it more but couldn't score.

 #135423  by kali o.
 Wed Apr 22, 2009 2:31 pm
Imakeholesinu wrote:That 3rd period scrum in front of the net you could see from the replay it was a goal. If O'Rourke hadn't had such a quick whistle then this wouldn't be an issue. The problem was though he then went to review it after he said he blew the play dead. According to the official rules, once a play has been blown dead by an official it is not reviewable. So when O'Rourke went to review then the play should have continued with the puck crossing the line while Roberta lay spread eagle on the ice.
Puh-lease. That was a no goal no matter which way they took it, dead play or pushing Luongo's leg in net with the stick.
The officiating was trash, but the Blues never took advantage especially in OT.


It was good, not sure what you are talking about - especially since the Blue's are the one's that ended up on the advantage end. The Blue's just couldn't penetrate the D and were kept on the outside (which allowed Luongo easy saves). Anyone have the final stats PP stats and 5 on 3 #'s?

Edit: I checked, 24 TS canucks, 18 Blues. No contest. Not even considering 5 on 3's.
Our Team Defense was poor. Jackman was out of position and coughed up the puck way to many times.
Jackman was the only reason it wasn't worse, imo.
Blues were playing 3 lines and still outplayed the Canucks 70% of the game.
If ya say so. Desperation gave them some energy (after the goals), but they still couldn't beat the obviously better team. And they were dead and totally out of it prior to those 2 quick goals.
The Blues wanted it more but couldn't score.
Because they don't have the depth the canucks do, nor the goaltending. Like me and zeus stated at the beginning :)

 #135427  by Imakeholesinu
 Wed Apr 22, 2009 4:31 pm
kali o. wrote:
Imakeholesinu wrote:That 3rd period scrum in front of the net you could see from the replay it was a goal. If O'Rourke hadn't had such a quick whistle then this wouldn't be an issue. The problem was though he then went to review it after he said he blew the play dead. According to the official rules, once a play has been blown dead by an official it is not reviewable. So when O'Rourke went to review then the play should have continued with the puck crossing the line while Roberta lay spread eagle on the ice.
Puh-lease. That was a no goal no matter which way they took it, dead play or pushing Luongo's leg in net with the stick.
The officiating was trash, but the Blues never took advantage especially in OT.


It was good, not sure what you are talking about - especially since the Blue's are the one's that ended up on the advantage end. The Blue's just couldn't penetrate the D and were kept on the outside (which allowed Luongo easy saves). Anyone have the final stats PP stats and 5 on 3 #'s?

Edit: I checked, 24 TS canucks, 18 Blues. No contest. Not even considering 5 on 3's.
Our Team Defense was poor. Jackman was out of position and coughed up the puck way to many times.
Jackman was the only reason it wasn't worse, imo.
Blues were playing 3 lines and still outplayed the Canucks 70% of the game.
If ya say so. Desperation gave them some energy (after the goals), but they still couldn't beat the obviously better team. And they were dead and totally out of it prior to those 2 quick goals.
The Blues wanted it more but couldn't score.
Because they don't have the depth the canucks do, nor the goaltending. Like me and zeus stated at the beginning :)
Vancouver will be a different team next season.

The Sedin's (UFA) and Sundin (UFA) along with, Pyatt (UFA), Krog (UFA), Vaananen (UFA), Wellwood(RFA), Burrows(UFA), Ohlund(UFA), O'Brien(RFA), Ouellet(UFA) are just a couple of the guys that are going to be RFA or UFA when their season ends.

 #135436  by kali o.
 Wed Apr 22, 2009 7:24 pm
Imakeholesinu wrote: Vancouver will be a different team next season.

The Sedin's (UFA) and Sundin (UFA) along with, Pyatt (UFA), Krog (UFA), Vaananen (UFA), Wellwood(RFA), Burrows(UFA), Ohlund(UFA), O'Brien(RFA), Ouellet(UFA) are just a couple of the guys that are going to be RFA or UFA when their season ends.
Teams are different every year, the free agent status doesn't change much, it's just a reality of the new cap system. Pretty much every team is like that now in the "new" NHL now - what's your point?

St. Louis got swept, nothin left but the tears and excuses I guess. /shrug

It'll be interesting to see who the Canucks play next and whether the rest hurts or helps em. I think they'll get Sundin and Salo back, which will be huge.

 #135496  by Zeus
 Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:17 pm
Chris wrote:
Zeus wrote:Wow. I gave the Blues a little more credit than they deserved. Looks like they're gonna learn the Ottawa way
no ottawa goes futher before dissapointing. then they blow up their team to get better, alienate every player not named Alfreddson whose to busy enjoying the dick sucking they are giving him to care.

The Blues earned there way in and ran out of gas. THe difference was exactly what you said it would be Zeus. It was Luongo who was stellar. That was a good game yesterday though.

Right now I'm too busy being lectured on how when you are a goalie and initiate contact with someone skating backward a few feet outside the crease it's goaltender interference. no....no it's not...
The first year Ottawa was in the playoffs they were a good young team that was supposed to be one to watch out for and they got Ished (speaking of Ish, where the hell has that boy been?) by the Leafs and were swept in the first round. Then they got beat 3 more times in the next 4 years by the Leafs by the second round. Ottawa learned the very, very hard way what it takes to win in the playoffs.

 #135499  by Chris
 Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:48 pm
Zeus wrote:
Chris wrote:
Zeus wrote:Wow. I gave the Blues a little more credit than they deserved. Looks like they're gonna learn the Ottawa way
no ottawa goes futher before dissapointing. then they blow up their team to get better, alienate every player not named Alfreddson whose to busy enjoying the dick sucking they are giving him to care.

The Blues earned there way in and ran out of gas. THe difference was exactly what you said it would be Zeus. It was Luongo who was stellar. That was a good game yesterday though.

Right now I'm too busy being lectured on how when you are a goalie and initiate contact with someone skating backward a few feet outside the crease it's goaltender interference. no....no it's not...
The first year Ottawa was in the playoffs they were a good young team that was supposed to be one to watch out for and they got Ished (speaking of Ish, where the hell has that boy been?) by the Leafs and were swept in the first round. Then they got beat 3 more times in the next 4 years by the Leafs by the second round. Ottawa learned the very, very hard way what it takes to win in the playoffs.
yes, they did. and then they started trading away and alienating the core players on their team (Something Alfreddson is not. you have to have heart to be the core of a team)

 #136365  by Chris
 Wed May 13, 2009 7:37 pm
nobody can beat the best goalie in the game.....

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

 #136372  by Imakeholesinu
 Wed May 13, 2009 10:19 pm
ROBERTAAAAAAA ROBERTTAAAAAA!

That sucks for the Caps tonight. 5 - 0 at one point? Varlamov imploded.

 #136375  by kali o.
 Wed May 13, 2009 10:26 pm
Meh, Canucks beat themselves, 3 outta 4 of those games, Gotta hand it to the Hawks for game 6 though - both teams came to play, but Hawks either wanted it more or got the better bounces. Either way, entertaining game.

 #136382  by Zeus
 Thu May 14, 2009 12:11 am
Chris wrote:nobody can beat the best goalie in the game.....

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
That was a helluva lot more than Luongo. The Canucks simply couldn't handle the Chicago onslaught

 #136402  by Chris
 Thu May 14, 2009 3:04 pm
man fuck goddamned versus. you have 2 fucking game 7's on the same night and you schedule them at the same time. Whoever is in charge of scheduling is fucking retarded. it's GAME FUCKING 7 YOU DO NOT NOT TELEVISE ONE OF THEM! Fucking ass holes.