kali o. wrote:Actually, if I find the file, I'll show you some funny pictures taken.
Feel free.
kali o. wrote:As for those dudes harassing you, I had them checked too. What can I say, I was curious and it was a simple request. It's funny too, since you claimed to work with them, but one of those guys is using a fake name on facebook (lol...if they were coworkers, you'd know the real names).
Tell me something I don't know. Do you think I didn't know that those people hide behind fake identities when I posted those names here?
Anyway, be afraid all you want - they are nobody.
I was well aware that they were "nobodies" within their power structure when I posted that to you. They are low-ranking scum; not important enough to have files yet anywhere, I'm sure - mostly in their twenties, new faces to the Masonic power game. They are however still Freemasons and fancy themselves Templars - and I absolutely have reason to believe they were talking about 9/11 from inside information.
Do you think I gave you every name I worked with? Or told you everything about them? You have been threatening to misrepresent me to a judge and pretend I was a friend to these people and call me a terrorist, as I recall.
I *will* give you at least one other name if you prefer - you can check him out at your leisure. That one is unlikely to be a nobody. If you are indeed in military-industrial circles, then you really should - because you keep pretending here that you are unaware of the essential truths on a lot of important issues I bring up, and your own information...
Well, I'll put it this way: if you really don't know the truth about 9/11, you are not high-ranking enough to make me "poop my pants".
And if you do and you're lying about that here on a payroll or something, Kal - then yes, I will indeed give you what you seem to want and be afraid of you - but God help your poor soul, in that case.
And it is not a violation of anything to privately assess threats
Depends what you did, who you called, what you used. As you may recall, you fundamentally misrepresented me in order to provoke me. Indeed you still do.
Again - and this seems to be a point you don't really understand - everyone has Fourth Amendment rights. In fact if you took any pictures of me outside of a public place, or had any of my papers online or off searched, or invaded my home, or my possessions ("effects" in the original wording), you are Constitutionally out of line there. Californian law - which you would have been subject to in the process of gathering information there - is pretty stringent about civil rights violations compared to other states.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Ame ... nstitution
However - as I have noted before - I was out of line as well. I have tried to apologize for that; which you have repeatedly rejected.
I simply note one thing - every time I've accused you of having connections here yourself, you have essentially denied it.
It has been worth all of this to finally find out that you WERE misrepresenting yourself in that way. I have known for a long time that such personalities as yours don't develop outside of power structures.
“I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong."
--Frederick Douglass