The Shrine

Kim Jong Un has been "missing" for 4 weeks or so now, rumors are he's ill.....the exact rumor is that he's become addicted to cheese, and is fat, and his fat somehow broke his ankles and he's not trying to recover.....uhhhh right, the other rumor is a coup is taking place, or took place, or is going to take place, f I dunno, but it's worth paying attention to.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-29489134

Eric wrote:Kim Jong Un has been "missing" for 4 weeks or so now, rumors are he's ill.....the exact rumor is that he's become addicted to cheese, and is fat, and his fat somehow broke his ankles and he's not trying to recover.....uhhhh right, the other rumor is a coup is taking place, or took place, or is going to take place, f I dunno, but it's worth paying attention to.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-29489134

If things are getting better, lets credit Dennis Rodman!

I like those rumours -- forcing me to google now, since I have not paid attention.

Very possibly the long-rumored Rothschild "quiet coup" there.

The Rothschilds have hated the Kims for a long time for disallowing a Rothschild central bank in North Korea. I was briefly in contact with some international security personnel back in the old days who mentioned the possibility that "a jackal would be sent".

Those who don't know what a jackal is in an international security context...well, I won't be the one to tell you. :>

Let's just say Rodman gave him something special with his hand.

Let's just say that movie was financed by US espionage as well, and by Israeli espionage too, Seek. Please stop thinking assassination is a subject to joke about. Rogen's little stunt did more damage to any actual diplomatic process than a horde of rampaging soldiers could have.

As I keep telling you - the Israeli Rothschilds want control over 100% of world banking. The Kims have repeatedly barred Israeli bankers from establishing and taking over a North Korean central bank. So the Rothschilds want the Kims dead.

THAT is what this is all about; nothing to do with human rights violations. The Rothschilds backed Mandela back before Mandela was any kind of peace activist, when he was putting burning tires full of gasoline on the heads of pro-Dutch black South Africans. And yet they don't do anything about Mugabe, who is the actual king of human rights violations and torture in our era.

It is all about money. It is always all about money. "Freedom" is the line given to you to secure your support.

LOL WUT?

SineSwiper wrote:LOL WUT?

Just catching up, are we?

Hiya, Sine. You hard of hearing?

Trust me...I'd be as happy to see peace between North and South Korea as anybody.

But NOT if it happens via a Rothschild-backed murder of Kim Jong Un.

That may have already happened, sad to say. While working for the military-industrial hedge fund I had the bad grace to work for during my time off - the one I keep trying to warn some of you about, the one in which people were advocating to start a new world war for profit, the one I have been to the cops over and over about without any luck - I heard rumors as early as 2010 that a "jackal" (an Israeli assassin) was on the docket for Un if he didn't play ball for the banking system.

The North Koreans still have artwork up of what U.S. soldiers did LAST time we invaded that country, unilaterally, out of ideological dislike. You can call it "propaganda" if you like; based on what our military later did in Vietnam in a repeat of the conflict, however, I doubt that as much of it is propaganda as you may believe.

Yes, it is an authoritarian dictatorship that practices prison camps and torture. We had a hand in provoking that when our soldiers went in and killed more than 350,000 North Koreans; at a cost of 170,000 of our own troops. And of course, the United States has a higher percentage of our people in prison than any industrialized nation; and torture remains legal here and Gitmo remains open, last I checked.

Can any of you tell me why the Korean War actually started, by the way?

Replay wrote:We had a hand in provoking that when our soldiers went in and killed more than 350,000 North Koreans; at a cost of 170,000 of our own troops.

wat

Korean War, Eric. You remember, the one everyone forgets about? M.A.S.H.? Fighting Communism?

I will donate a dollar to you on Tsu if you can tell me what their "act of war" against us was to start it. I can't recall it, myself, without looking it up.

As the dollar remained unclaimed I will note it: In June 1950, North Korean forces attacked South Korea, with given rationale to assassinate South Korean leader Syngmun Rhee.

There is no doubt that defending our allies was and is valid; and yet, just like happened in Vietnam, the stresses of war caused both sides to commit atrocities.

Both North Korean and South Korean/United States forces attacked civilians and civilian villages as part of the overall war effort at various points and committed massacres, including of children.

To this day the Kim government uses "safety from United States aggression" as an excuse given to their people to stay in power.